From: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: unify the check on atomic sleeping in __might_sleep() and schedule_bug()
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:40:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <503446AA.2020004@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
From: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Fengguang Wu <wfg@linux.intel.com> has reported the bug:
[ 0.043953] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/1/0x10000002
[ 0.044017] no locks held by swapper/0/1.
[ 0.044692] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.6.0-rc1-00420-gb7aebb9 #34
[ 0.045861] Call Trace:
[ 0.048071] [<c106361e>] __schedule_bug+0x5e/0x70
[ 0.048890] [<c1b28701>] __schedule+0x91/0xb10
[ 0.049660] [<c14472ea>] ? vsnprintf+0x33a/0x450
[ 0.050444] [<c1060006>] ? lg_local_lock+0x6/0x70
[ 0.051256] [<c14fb5b1>] ? wait_for_xmitr+0x31/0x90
[ 0.052019] [<c144fd55>] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa5/0xf0
[ 0.052903] [<c1b2a532>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x30
[ 0.053759] [<c105cdbb>] ? up+0x1b/0x70
[ 0.054421] [<c1065d6b>] __cond_resched+0x1b/0x30
[ 0.055228] [<c1b292d5>] _cond_resched+0x45/0x50
[ 0.056020] [<c1b26c58>] mutex_lock_nested+0x28/0x370
[ 0.056884] [<c1034222>] ? console_unlock+0x3a2/0x4e0
[ 0.057741] [<c1ac8559>] __irq_alloc_descs+0x39/0x1c0
[ 0.058589] [<c10223bc>] io_apic_setup_irq_pin+0x2c/0x310
[ 0.060042] [<c20638df>] setup_IO_APIC+0x101/0x744
[ 0.060878] [<c1021d51>] ? clear_IO_APIC+0x31/0x50
[ 0.061695] [<c20600f4>] native_smp_prepare_cpus+0x538/0x680
[ 0.062644] [<c2056a91>] ? do_one_initcall+0x12c/0x12c
[ 0.063517] [<c2056a91>] ? do_one_initcall+0x12c/0x12c
[ 0.064016] [<c2056adc>] kernel_init+0x4b/0x17f
[ 0.064790] [<c2056a91>] ? do_one_initcall+0x12c/0x12c
[ 0.065660] [<c1b2bbd6>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10
It was caused by that:
native_smp_prepare_cpus()
preempt_disable() //preempt_count++
mutex_lock() //in __irq_alloc_descs
__might_sleep() //system is booting, avoid check
might_resched()
__schedule()
preempt_disable() //preempt_count++
schedule_bug() //preempt_count > 1, report bug
The __might_sleep() avoid check on atomic sleeping until the system booted
while the schedule_bug() doesn't, it's the reason for the bug.
This patch will add one additional check in schedule_bug() to avoid check
until the system booted, so the check on atomic sleeping will be unified.
Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@linux.intel.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 4376c9f..3396c33 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3321,7 +3321,8 @@ static inline void schedule_debug(struct task_struct *prev)
* schedule() atomically, we ignore that path for now.
* Otherwise, whine if we are scheduling when we should not be.
*/
- if (unlikely(in_atomic_preempt_off() && !prev->exit_state))
+ if (unlikely(in_atomic_preempt_off() && !prev->exit_state
+ && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING))
__schedule_bug(prev);
rcu_sleep_check();
--
1.7.4.1
next reply other threads:[~2012-08-22 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-22 2:40 Michael Wang [this message]
2012-09-03 2:16 ` [PATCH] sched: unify the check on atomic sleeping in __might_sleep() and schedule_bug() Michael Wang
2012-09-13 9:27 ` Michael Wang
2012-09-13 10:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-14 3:02 ` Michael Wang
2012-09-17 2:25 ` Michael Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=503446AA.2020004@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.