From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>
To: ML netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: stmmac mitigation and ethtool coalesce parameters
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:14:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <503486B8.7080706@st.com> (raw)
Hello
I'm reworking the mitigation schema in the stmmac and removing the old
and dead STMMAC_TIMER code.
On new chips we have an HW RX-Watchdog that can be used for mitigating
the Rx-interrupts and first results look promising.
Before posting the patches I have a doubt about the ethtool coalesce
parameters to use in the driver to tune the following parameters:
- On Rx-side I have:
a parameter that is the RI Watchdog Timer count. It indicates the
number of system clock cycles.
- On Tx-side, the mitigation schema I'm using is based on a SW timer
that calls the tx function (stmmac_tx) to reclaim the resource after
transmitting the frames.
Also there is another parameter (like a threshold) used to program
the descriptors avoiding to set the interrupt on completion bit in
when the frame is sent (xmit). This means that the stmmac_tx can be
called by the ISR too. This approach is showing really good figures
as well.
so I wonder which are the appropriate ethtool coalesce parameters to
use? Or could I tune them by using sysfs entries?
Welcome advice.
Peppe
reply other threads:[~2012-08-22 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=503486B8.7080706@st.com \
--to=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.