From: Radu Moisan <radu.moisan@intel.com>
To: Chris Larson <clarson@kergoth.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coreutils: Upgrade to upstream version 8.17
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:24:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5034EBB3.3010906@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZANn8tSTrfwbOCi6WoiURVRcG3w_dF5-nnwMC+7Pz=aK01w@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/22/2012 05:08 PM, Chris Larson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Radu Moisan <radu.moisan@intel.com> wrote:
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..e32f612
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch
>> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
>> +Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan <radu.moisan@intel.com>
>> +Upstream status: pending
>> +
>> +The new version of coreutils, adds use of canonicalize_file_name() function defined in canonicalize.h
>> +The problem: the function is redefined to rpl_canonicalize_file_name by means of a macro,which gives
>> +an undefined reference error at compile time. Macro definition depends in the end on
>> +gl_cv_func_realpath_works but assumed true only when set to "yes"
>> +
>> +Index: coreutils-8.17/m4/canonicalize.m4
>> +===================================================================
>> +--- coreutils-8.17.orig/m4/canonicalize.m4 2012-05-08 12:05:23.000000000 +0300
>> ++++ coreutils-8.17/m4/canonicalize.m4 2012-08-17 14:20:22.000000000 +0300
>> +@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
>> + [gl_cv_func_realpath_works=no],
>> + [case "$host_os" in
>> + # Guess yes on glibc systems.
>> +- *-gnu*) gl_cv_func_realpath_works="guessing yes" ;;
>> ++ *-gnu*) gl_cv_func_realpath_works="yes" ;;
>> + # If we don't know, assume the worst.
>> + *) gl_cv_func_realpath_works="guessing no" ;;
>> + esac
> Wouldn't it be better to provide a cached test result in the site
> files for this test, rather than relying on a host_os based guess?
I really don't know the answer to your question. The patch was intended
to provide minimally invasive change to the original file. If you
elaborate more on your proposal, I would gladly take into consideration
a future patch to address this issue.
radu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-22 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-22 10:43 [PATCH] coreutils: Upgrade to upstream version 8.17 Radu Moisan
2012-08-22 14:08 ` Chris Larson
2012-08-22 14:24 ` Radu Moisan [this message]
2012-08-22 14:26 ` Khem Raj
2012-08-22 14:30 ` Chris Larson
2012-08-22 16:36 ` Mark Hatle
2012-09-03 8:52 ` Radu Moisan
2012-09-03 15:28 ` Saul Wold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5034EBB3.3010906@intel.com \
--to=radu.moisan@intel.com \
--cc=clarson@kergoth.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.