From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Issue with ath9k and tx/rx chainmask: 3x3 doesn't work with mask of 0x1.
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:05:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <503573C6.4000103@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50355C21.2030508@candelatech.com>
On 08/22/2012 03:24 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 08/22/2012 01:30 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2012-08-20 10:24 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>>> I am trying to test out an attenuator. For now, I have only a single attenuator,
>>> so I set tx and rx chainmask to 0x1 on both AP and Station machine.
>>>
>>> I then connected channel 0 on the two machines together through the
>>> attenuator.
>>>
>>> I have two station interfaces on the station machine. They both
>>> seem to associate OK, but they cannot receive dhcp responses.
>>>
>>> It *seems* that broadcast packets may go through fine.
>>>
>>> If I force the rate down to 1x1 or 2x2 MIMO (or force disable /n
>>> and just use /a), then it appears to work fine.
>>>
>>> Nics are WPEA-127n (AR9380). Kernel is 3.5.1+ on AP, 3.5.2+ on station
>>> machine.
>>>
>>> I can see why forcing it down to 1x1 might work around some issue,
>>> but I find it funny that 2x2 works while 3x3 does not.
>> Did you set the chainmask manually via debugfs? If so, don't do that!
>> Use the nl80211 antenna control API (e.g. via iw)
>
> [root@lec2010-ath9k-1 lanforge]# ./local/sbin/iw phy wiphy0 set antenna 1 1
> command failed: Operation not supported (-95)
> [root@lec2010-ath9k-1 lanforge]# ./local/sbin/iw phy wiphy0 set antenna 1
> command failed: Operation not supported (-95)
> [root@lec2010-ath9k-1 lanforge]# ./local/sbin/iw phy wiphy0 set antenna 3
> command failed: Operation not supported (-95)
> [root@lec2010-ath9k-1 lanforge]# ./local/sbin/iw phy wiphy0 set antenna 7
> command failed: Operation not supported (-95)
> [root@lec2010-ath9k-1 lanforge]# uname -a
> Linux lec2010-ath9k-1 3.5.1+ #15 SMP PREEMPT Thu Aug 9 09:31:45 PDT 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
I'm guessing it is because of this:
static int ieee80211_set_antenna(struct wiphy *wiphy, u32 tx_ant, u32 rx_ant)
{
struct ieee80211_local *local = wiphy_priv(wiphy);
if (local->started)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
return drv_set_antenna(local, tx_ant, rx_ant);
}
So, we'd have to admin down all virtual stations/aps/whatever before setting the
antenna configuration?
Thanks,
Ben
>
> # Set previously using debugfs.
> [root@lec2010-ath9k-1 lanforge]# cat /debug/ieee80211/wiphy0/ath9k/tx_chainmask
> 0x00000001
>
> [root@lec2010-ath9k-1 lanforge]# ./local/sbin/iw phy wiphy0 set antenna 7 7
> command failed: Operation not supported (-95)
>
>
> Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
>
>>
>> - Felix
>>
>
>
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-23 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-20 20:24 Issue with ath9k and tx/rx chainmask: 3x3 doesn't work with mask of 0x1 Ben Greear
2012-08-22 20:30 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-08-22 21:22 ` Ben Greear
2012-08-22 22:24 ` Ben Greear
2012-08-23 0:05 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2012-08-23 0:48 ` Ben Greear
2012-08-23 5:29 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-08-23 5:40 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=503573C6.4000103@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.