From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: stigge@antcom.de (Roland Stigge) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:18:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] usb: change the dependency chain for LPC32XX and ISP1301 In-Reply-To: <5035D9E0.1000905@linutronix.de> References: <50355A2C.9010505@antcom.de> <5035D9E0.1000905@linutronix.de> Message-ID: <5035E75F.5080801@antcom.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08/23/2012 09:21 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 08/23/2012 12:16 AM, Roland Stigge wrote: >> This issue could be resolved in a different way: Have you followed the >> discussion at linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org on 2012-08-20, >> Subject "i2c: pnx: Fix bit definitions"? If nothing unexpected turns >> out, PNX4008 should probably be removed altogether. (Practically >> abandoned arch for 6 years.) Easily possible for v3.7. > > Ach. I assumed that is being merged. The PNX arch does not define > USB_ARCH_HAS_OHCI so I goes that you can't select it there? Yes, this issue will be gone also. >> Then, the resulting solution is much simpler and Sebastian's patch >> obsolete. > > That would be what? Well, your idea won't be obsolete completely. :-) But much simpler without all the "PNX4008 || LPC32XX" stuff. Following Alan's proposal, I'd prefer not introducing new symbols, and much of the "PNX4008 || LPC32XX" logic won't be necessary anymore. For the PNX4008 removal - should I already post a patch to build the respective changes on top of, without PNX4008 references? Thanks, Roland