From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Print a warning if firmware is requested when tasks are frozen
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 19:30:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50363.1304379012@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 03 May 2011 00:44:51 +0200." <201105030044.51661.rjw@sisk.pl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1079 bytes --]
On Tue, 03 May 2011 00:44:51 +0200, "Rafael J. Wysocki" said:
> + if (WARN_ON(usermodehelper_is_disabled()))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
Since this is a "no user serviceable parts inside" type of error, so I guess
WARN_ON rather than a printk(KERN_WARNING is a good idea so we get
a traceback pointing out the offending driver.
I have to wonder 2 things though:
1) What percent of the time the missing firmware (or other issues, like the
display not being resumed yet) will prevent the WARN_ON output from making it
to the display *anyhow*, so the user *still* hits the power button to try again?
2) What percent of the time the WARN_ON output will itself make the user
think the resume has died rather than just being slow, causing them to power
cycle and hope for a clean boot?
Maybe something like this instead?
if (WARN_ON(usermodehelper_is_disable()))) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "Resume continuing, but firmware for %s not loaded", device);
return -EBUSY;
}
(or whatever that %s actually needs to work)
All the same, it still looks better than what we're doing now.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-02 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-02 22:44 [RFC][PATCH] PM: Print a warning if firmware is requested when tasks are frozen Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-02 23:12 ` Greg KH
2011-05-02 23:12 ` Greg KH
2011-05-02 23:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-02 23:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-02 23:28 ` Greg KH
2011-05-02 23:28 ` Greg KH
2011-05-03 0:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-03 0:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-03 14:05 ` Greg KH
2011-05-03 14:05 ` Greg KH
2011-05-02 23:30 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-02 23:30 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2011-05-03 11:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-03 11:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-03 14:06 ` Greg KH
2011-05-03 17:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-03 17:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-03 14:06 ` Greg KH
2011-05-03 15:47 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-03 15:47 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-03 15:56 ` Joe Perches
2011-05-03 17:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-03 17:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-03 15:56 ` Joe Perches
[not found] ` <201105031914.18160.rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-05-03 18:03 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-02 22:44 Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50363.1304379012@localhost \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.