From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C704E002A6 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 06:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q7NDVMD5011389 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 06:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.146.67] (128.224.146.67) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.309.2; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 06:31:21 -0700 Message-ID: <503630A3.90606@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:31:15 -0400 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yocto Project Mailing List References: <20120823151259.f1550eb3-e33f-4100-93dc-f39eab90e4b1.mhubig@imko.de> In-Reply-To: <20120823151259.f1550eb3-e33f-4100-93dc-f39eab90e4b1.mhubig@imko.de> Subject: Re: 1.3_M3 do_kernel_config failes, config_frag.txt is crippled. X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:31:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12-08-23 09:24 AM, Markus Hubig wrote: > Hello @all, > > because I need the commit 'dcadeda' I switched from denzil to 1.3_M3. > Now I get a strage error while do_kernel_config: > > | configme --reconfig --output<...>/linux-portuxg20-standard-build standard stamp9g20 > | [INFO] Configuring target/machine combo: "standard/stamp9g20" > | [INFO] collecting configs in ./meta/meta-series > | [##################################################] (completed in 0 seconds) > | ERROR: could not sanitize configuration fragments > | errors are logged in meta/cfg/standard/portuxg20/config.log > > Digin a bit deeper I found: > > | [INFO] Sanitizing meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/fuse/fuse.cfg > | [INFO] Sanitizing meta/cfg/kernel-cache/ktypes/standard/standard.cfg > | [INFO] Sanitizing meta/cfg/kernel-cache/cfg/devtmpfs.cfg > | [INFO] Sanitizing meta/cfg/kernel-cache/cfg/debugfs.cfg > | [INFO] Sanitizing meta/cfgportuxg20 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > | [ERROR] Kern frag does not exist > > And again a bit deeper I found that the file > > | ./meta/cfg/standard/portuxg20/config_frag.txt > > is somewhat crippled: > > | ... > | /kernel-cache/ktypes/standard/standard.cfg > | /kernel-cache/cfg/devtmpfs.cfg > | /kernel-cache/cfg/debugfs.cfg > | portuxg20 > ^^^^^^^^^ > | hardware.cfg > | non-hardware.cfg > | /kernel-cache/features/usb-net/usb-net.cfg > | portuxg20 > | hardware.cfg > | non-hardware.cfg > | /kernel-cache/features/usb-net/usb-net.cfg > | /hardware.cfg > | /non-hardware.cfg > | /portuxg20/portuxg20.cfg > | /kernel-cache/features/netfilter/netfilter.cfg > | /kernel-cache/features/taskstats/taskstats.cfg > > Who is creating this file? Were you using yocto-bsp to create the BSP framework ? I did some test builds of the layer you previously sent me, and I didn't reproduce the problem, but this is the same thing that you had seen last week. Do you have an updated layer that I can try against master ? Bruce > > Cheers, Markus >