From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49160) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4sie-00041i-C8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:10:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4sid-00017j-0C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:10:32 -0400 Received: from david.siemens.de ([192.35.17.14]:34482) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4sic-00017b-Mc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:10:30 -0400 Message-ID: <50376F2E.2010302@siemens.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:10:22 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1345703083-25322-1-git-send-email-mmogilvi_qemu@miniinfo.net> <503714B0.1020404@web.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Running Microport UNIX (ca 1987) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: malc Cc: Matthew Ogilvie , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 2012-08-24 14:02, malc wrote: > On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> On 2012-08-24 05:58, malc wrote: >>> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote: >>> >>>> After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can >>>> successfully run "Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1" (ca 1987) >>>> under qemu. (although not if I try to enable KVM) >>>> >>>> Version 1 of this series was posted about 4 weeks ago. See >>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?submitter=15654 >>>> >>>> The patches are all independent, except that the documentation part >>>> of patch 5 (vga) adds onto patch 4 (retrace=) changes. >>> >>> [..snip..] >>> >>> Applied, thanks. >> >> Err, does this comply with the -rcX process? Patch 6 alone has been on >> the list for less than a day. Only now I was able to comment on it, and >> I would prefer to not have it merged that easily. >> > > Where's the process documented? As for patch 6 i confess i haven't paid > enough attention and was under impression that this set was mainly about > adjusting the comment about mov crN behavior. > See http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/1.2 e.g. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux