diff for duplicates of <503BF8D3.9060507@samsung.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 52f4483..fe068eb 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -36,12 +36,12 @@ but you know, this should be separated :-) > }; > -> i2c@12C60000 { +> i2c at 12C60000 { > @@ -72,6 +79,54 @@ > status = "disabled"; > }; > -> + mshc_0: dwmmc0@12200000 { +> + mshc_0: dwmmc0 at 12200000 { How about to keep the consistent naming? dwmmc or dw_mmc? I think, 'dw_mmc' makes more sense? @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ We need to think again the name of dw-mshc-sdr-timing, dw-mshc-ddr-timing? > #size-cells =<0>; > }; > -> + dwmmc0@12200000 { +> + dwmmc0 at 12200000 { > + compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dw-mshc"; I'm not sure, 'exynos5250-dw-mshc' is right here. Because it is just diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 2ec1fa3..f1513b4 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,17 +1,9 @@ "ref\01345982371-26483-1-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org\0" "ref\01345982371-26483-4-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org\0" - "From\0Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: dts: Add nodes for dw_mmc controllers for Samsung Exynos5250 platforms\0" + "From\0kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: dts: Add nodes for dw_mmc controllers for Samsung Exynos5250 platforms\0" "Date\0Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:46:43 -0700\0" - "To\0Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>\0" - "Cc\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" - linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org - cjb@laptop.org - kgene.kim@samsung.com - girish.shivananjappa@linaro.org - jh80.chung@samsung.com - tgih.jun@samsung.com - " patches@linaro.org\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 08/26/12 04:59, Thomas Abraham wrote:\n" @@ -52,12 +44,12 @@ "\n" "> \t};\n" ">\n" - "> \ti2c@12C60000 {\n" + "> \ti2c at 12C60000 {\n" "> @@ -72,6 +79,54 @@\n" "> \t\tstatus = \"disabled\";\n" "> \t};\n" ">\n" - "> +\tmshc_0: dwmmc0@12200000 {\n" + "> +\tmshc_0: dwmmc0 at 12200000 {\n" "\n" "How about to keep the consistent naming? dwmmc or dw_mmc? I think, \n" "'dw_mmc' makes more sense?\n" @@ -82,7 +74,7 @@ "> \t\t#size-cells =<0>;\n" "> \t};\n" ">\n" - "> +\tdwmmc0@12200000 {\n" + "> +\tdwmmc0 at 12200000 {\n" "> +\t\tcompatible = \"samsung,exynos5250-dw-mshc\";\n" "\n" "I'm not sure, 'exynos5250-dw-mshc' is right here. Because it is just \n" @@ -98,4 +90,4 @@ "Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,\n" SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -ce4aa82b442a5abf981bab1c99a0b9fff50d213206df83e91a6a073f5ca0e5f9 +af536b8229c23620e527034e70073fda6461582a6c81ffe56db649c309816528
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.