From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Kirkwood Subject: Re: Ceph benchmarks Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:27:18 +1200 Message-ID: <503C48A6.5060205@catalyst.net.nz> References: <503C2A86.8080503@inktank.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bertrand.catalyst.net.nz ([202.78.240.40]:49664 "EHLO mail.catalyst.net.nz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750744Ab2H1E1W (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:27:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <503C2A86.8080503@inktank.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Nelson Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Han?= , ceph-devel +1 to that. I've been seeing 4-6 MB/s for 4K writes for 1 OSD with 1 SSD for journal and another for data [1]. Interestingly I did see some nice scaling with 4K random reads: 2-4 MB/s per thread for up to 8 threads (looked like it plateaued thereafter). Cheers Mark [1] FYI not on the box I posted about before - on a more modern pc with 6Bbit/s SATA. On 28/08/12 14:18, Mark Nelson wrote: > 5) rados bench tests with smaller requests could be interesting on 15k > drives. I typically see about 1-2MB/s per OSD for 4k requests with > 7200rpm SATA disks.