From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40360) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T6FQX-0004s1-PO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 02:37:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T6FQW-0002rm-1u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 02:37:29 -0400 Received: from mailout1.samsung.com ([203.254.224.24]:16350) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T6FQV-0002rH-OL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 02:37:27 -0400 Received: from epcpsbgm1.samsung.com (epcpsbgm1 [203.254.230.26]) by mailout1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0M9G00KZRD1A93S0@mailout1.samsung.com> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:37:25 +0900 (KST) Received: from [172.21.111.108] ([182.198.1.3]) by mmp2.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01 (7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTPA id <0M9G00I8YD2CUNY0@mmp2.samsung.com> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:37:25 +0900 (KST) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:38:26 +0900 From: Yeongkyoon Lee In-reply-to: Message-id: <503C6762.8060002@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE References: <1343201734-12062-1-git-send-email-yeongkyoon.lee@samsung.com> <1343201734-12062-4-git-send-email-yeongkyoon.lee@samsung.com> <500FFBE0.70700@twiddle.net> <50140795.5030209@samsung.com> <503B208D.2020407@samsung.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH v4 3/3] tcg: Optimize qemu_ld/st by generating slow paths at the end of a block List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: blauwirbel@gmail.com, sw@weilnetz.de, laurent.desnogues@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson On 2012=EB=85=84 08=EC=9B=94 28=EC=9D=BC 03:31, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 27 August 2012 08:23, Yeongkyoon Lee wrote: >> BTW, who will finally confirm my patches? >> I have sent four version of my patches in which I have applied all= the >> reasonable feedbacks from this community. > If you'd like your patches committed you should not use the "[RFC]"= tag > in the Subject, because "RFC" means "I would like feedback on this > patch but do not intend it to be committed to master". > > -- PMM > Thanks, very nice information!