From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50342)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <yeongkyoon.lee@samsung.com>) id 1T6Fdq-0002K3-HK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 02:51:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <yeongkyoon.lee@samsung.com>) id 1T6Fdo-0006wQ-Bt
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 02:51:14 -0400
Received: from mailout4.samsung.com ([203.254.224.34]:13517)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <yeongkyoon.lee@samsung.com>) id 1T6Fdo-0006wE-0A
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 02:51:12 -0400
Received: from epcpsbgm2.samsung.com (epcpsbgm2 [203.254.230.27])
	by mailout4.samsung.com
	(Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit
	(built Nov
	17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0M9G0022TDOUU7T0@mailout4.samsung.com> for
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:51:07 +0900 (KST)
Received: from [172.21.111.108] ([182.198.1.3])
	by mmp2.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01
	(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011))
	with ESMTPA id <0M9G00KRQDP6KRJ0@mmp2.samsung.com> for
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:51:07 +0900 (KST)
Message-id: <503C6A98.7090906@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:52:08 +0900
From: Yeongkyoon Lee <yeongkyoon.lee@samsung.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
References: <1343201734-12062-1-git-send-email-yeongkyoon.lee@samsung.com>
	<1343201734-12062-4-git-send-email-yeongkyoon.lee@samsung.com>
	<500FFBE0.70700@twiddle.net> <50140795.5030209@samsung.com>
	<503B208D.2020407@samsung.com>
	<CAAu8pHta6XZ0XG6+jqGqa+NUfcS8WiKu2uYEn5ZH9T6gL6VxYw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <CAAu8pHta6XZ0XG6+jqGqa+NUfcS8WiKu2uYEn5ZH9T6gL6VxYw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH v4 3/3] tcg: Optimize qemu_ld/st by
 generating slow paths at the end of a block
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: laurent.desnogues@gmail.com, sw@weilnetz.de, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org


>> It's been a long time.
>>
>> I've tested the performances of one jump difference when fast qemu_ld/st
>> (TLB hit).
>> The result shows 3.6% CoreMark enhancement when reducing one jump where slow
>> paths are generated at the end of block as same for the both cases.
>> That means reducing one jump dominates the majority of performance
>> enhancement from LDST_OPTIMIZATION.
>> As a result, it needs extended MMU helper functions for attaining that
>> performance rising, and those extended functions are used only implicitly.
>>
>> BTW, who will finally confirm my patches?
>> I have sent four version of my patches in which I have applied all the
>> reasonable feedbacks from this community.
>> Currently, v4 is the final candidate though it might need merge with latest
>> HEAD because it was sent 1 month before.
> I think the patches should be applied when 1.3 development opens.
>

Thanks for your reply.
How do you estimate when 1.3 development is open?