From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, andi@firstfloor.org, ananth@in.ibm.com,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/mce: Move MCE sysfs attributes out of the per-cpu location
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:56:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <503DEE3C.6020406@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120829101302.GA26977@aftab.osrc.amd.com>
On 08/29/2012 03:43 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 01:11:55PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
>> All the MCE attributes currently exported via sysfs appear under
>> /sys/devices/system/machinecheck/machinecheck<n>/. Pretty much all of these
>> are global in nature and not specific to a processor. We have around 7
>> attributes duplicated across each processor and on multi-core multi-socket
>> machines, this amounts to quite a large number. So, move these out under
>> /sys/devices/system/machinecheck/ where they rightly belong.
>>
>> Note: I'm not sure if it's ok to change sysfs entries and this does break
>> userspace tools that depend on the current path for some of these attributes.
>> So, they will need to be updated to use the new path. However, if we ever get
>> to a point where cpu0 can be offlined, these tools will need to be updated
>> anyway (as they mostly hardcode machinecheck0 currently)
>
> How do you know that for all tools out there?
I don't - I've seen mcelog and related tools and they look in machinecheck0.
>
> I know, I know, moving them to /sys/.../machinecheck/ is the right thing
> to do but they're exposed to userspace and we're breaking it with this
> patch. And we don't break userspace so I'd guess we're stuck with the
> current situation.
Hmmm.. Can't we just deprecate these? ;)
Perhaps we can consider adding newer tunables in the right place.
Thanks,
Naveen
>
> Sorry.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-29 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-29 7:41 [PATCH RFC] x86/mce: Move MCE sysfs attributes out of the per-cpu location Naveen N. Rao
2012-08-29 10:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-29 10:26 ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2012-08-29 10:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-29 13:10 ` Naveen N. Rao
2012-08-29 14:43 ` Luck, Tony
2012-08-30 9:47 ` Naveen N. Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=503DEE3C.6020406@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.