From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wido den Hollander Subject: Re: Integration work Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:40:22 +0200 Message-ID: <503E1BC6.8080308@widodh.nl> References: <503D0A00.2080905@inktank.com> <503DE69B.70804@widodh.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp02.mail.pcextreme.nl ([109.72.87.138]:59613 "EHLO smtp02.mail.pcextreme.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752717Ab2H2Nk2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:40:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sylvain Munaut Cc: Ross Turk , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" On 08/29/2012 02:35 PM, Sylvain Munaut wrote: >> Correct me if I'm wrong, but when I was at Citrix in May this year somebody >> there told me that Xen was going 100% Qemu? > > Huh ... I've never heard this. Also the guys in ##xen haven't either. > I'm not really involved in xen dev and don't follow it closely but > that seems unlikely. The few slides I looked at from the Xen Summit a > couple days ago show that they really like their PV model. > I must be wrong then! > AFAIK QEMU is only used for HVM guests to emulate the hw. And even for > those HVM guest, it's recommended to use PV drivers for performance > which bypass the qemu layer all together. > Not sure where this came from then, but in that case it would take work from Citrix to get RBD in Xen. Wido > Cheers, > > Sylvain > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >