From: Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt-Nf8S+5hNwl710XsdtD+oqA@public.gmane.org>
To: "linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Windows IOPS Benchmark
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:13:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <503EB016.10603@abpni.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <503EAF26.6020009-Nf8S+5hNwl710XsdtD+oqA@public.gmane.org>
On 30/08/2012 01:09, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm using bcache with a RAID1 pair of SSDs (for the cache) with a
> MD-RAID10 spindle array for the backing device. On top of this is LVM.
> This setup is used with the Xen Hypervisor. Bcache is formatted with a
> sector size of 512 bytes.
>
> If I use an LV for a Linux DomU, I get fantastic disk performance
> using fio (about 23k random write). However, when I use IOMeter in a
> Windows HVM DomU (with GPLPV drivers installed), my avg IOPS is around
> 4000. I am using the "default" Access Specification. Am I doing
> something wrong? Changing the number of workers doesn't seem to help.
>
> Any advice is appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
Actually nvm, I forgot to enable the dist target for each of the works.
Now I'm getting an avg iops of about 34k.
But this does leave me with a question: is the number of "workers" in
IOMeter akin to "IO Depth" in fio?
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-30 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-30 0:09 Windows IOPS Benchmark Jonathan Tripathy
[not found] ` <503EAF26.6020009-Nf8S+5hNwl710XsdtD+oqA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-30 0:13 ` Jonathan Tripathy [this message]
[not found] ` <503EB016.10603-Nf8S+5hNwl710XsdtD+oqA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-30 12:48 ` David Rhodes Clymer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=503EB016.10603@abpni.co.uk \
--to=jonnyt-nf8s+5hnwl710xsdtd+oqa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.