All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
To: ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: A different Ceph benchmark - pgbench
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:53:58 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50405176.6050907@catalyst.net.nz> (raw)

I think I had previously mentioned that I am interested in using RBD for 
data backing a database. With the recent notable improvements in IO 
performance for smaller block sizes that came with 0.50 and 0.51 
versions I decided to do some benchmarking with Postgresql.

So here it is:

System : 4x (hyperthread) i3 3.3 Ghz 8G, 2x 128G Crucial M4
Ceph 0.51, 1x osd on 1 M4, 20G journal on the other, ext4 filesystems
Postgresql 9.2 with minimal tuning (shared_buffers = 1G, 
checkpoint_segments = 128)
1x RBD for postgres data, 1x RBD for postgres transaction log, ext4 
filesystems

Scale 300 (approx 5G)

connections | tx per second
------------+--------------
   4          |  287
   8          |  422
   16         |  591
   32         |  779
   64         |  866


Now this is quite an acceptable result (previous attempts had maxed out 
at 4 tx per sec). While it does not compare favourably with running the 
same setup directly on the attached drives (4000 tx per sec with 64 
connections), the difference is a 'mere' factor of 4 instead of orders 
of magnitude, so I am greatly encouraged!

By default Postgreql does IO in 8K blocks using library functions read 
and write - so this *was* a completely pessimal performance test - so it 
is really nice to see how things are improving - keep up the good work!

Regards

Mark


                 reply	other threads:[~2012-08-31  5:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50405176.6050907@catalyst.net.nz \
    --to=mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.