From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eumx.net (eumx.net [91.82.101.43]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B333E004AB for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 01:30:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50598 helo=eumx.net) by eumx.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T7Mct-0006p9-G4 for yocto@yoctoproject.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 08:30:51 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=eumx.net; h=message-id :date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=6CkZH+/CNzw13mbj32UCmaHD/AI=; b=FBXlWggBHBfrh5j51WinYmO2cxu9 WIcxWA5qvSMrMYGkma1xwTaPWvo2sXzbYXpf+x7InIZzrHT11wyooKMIqIujmwf2 Kpi4+6LIg1l9fDkqeQOZAIXAUtK7XmB6oixHqiuazAlqUEaymrjAaAcsjo9bLboK ItPi+zAN+l+x9Mo= Received: from [195.171.99.130] (port=14523 helo=[192.168.0.33]) by eumx.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T7Mct-0006p5-Dc for yocto@yoctoproject.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 08:30:51 +0000 Message-ID: <50407695.80807@communistcode.co.uk> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:32:21 +0100 From: Jack Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yocto@yoctoproject.org References: <5040751B.2070900@communistcode.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <5040751B.2070900@communistcode.co.uk> Subject: Re: meta-raspberry pi libav bbappend X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: ml@communistcode.co.uk List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 08:30:52 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 31/08/12 09:26, Jack Mitchell wrote: > I'm attempting to build for the Raspberry Pi again today and I have > hit a problem with libav. I have it BBMASK'ed in my local.conf however > it seems the recipe still gets sanity checked and can't find the > recipe to go with the bbappend so it fails. > > What is the best way to get around this? > > EDIT: I just checked the readme again and it seems as though meta-oe > is now required, is this the only hurdle in having a non meta-oe build > or has there been other additions recently? > > Regards, > Jack. > Just a quick note that I have no problem with using meta-oe, it's a curiosity and design question rather than a whinge! Cheers, -- Jack Mitchell (jack@embed.me.uk) Embedded Systems Engineer http://www.embed.me.uk --