From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1172383015870714046=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan at linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Powertop] Query: Weird Output values: Percentage over 100%
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:05:54 -0700
Message-ID: <5044F182.8010407@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: 20120903175750.GB3062@swordfish
To: powertop@lists.01.org
List-ID: <powertop@lists.01.org>

--===============1172383015870714046==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 9/3/2012 10:57 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (09/03/12 10:37), Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>>> Running on ARM: Panda Board.
>>
>> I wonder if the perf data is somehow incorrect on your platform.
>> powertop depends on correct timestamps for example.
>>
>>
> =

> I was thinking about this. Could it be possible that we lose
> some perf samples? E.g. we have start, but no end timestamps.

shouldn't... the buffers are quite large....


--===============1172383015870714046==--