From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Stigge Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] i2c: pnx: Fix bit definitions Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 22:16:22 +0200 Message-ID: <50451016.7010608@antcom.de> References: <1344411752-23469-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <20120818095108.GB24812@pengutronix.de> <5030A81E.5090508@antcom.de> <083DF309106F364B939360100EC290F823A0354A3D@eu1rdcrdc1wx030.exi.nxp.com> <20120820175527.GA9169@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120820175527.GA9169-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Kevin Wells , "vitalywool-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" , "khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org" , "ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org" , "grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org" , "linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Srinivas Bakki , "aletes.xgr-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" , "jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi Wolfram, On 20/08/12 19:55, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> I've never had my hands on a PNX4008 chip at NXP, but I do >> believe they are the same IP. That specific I2C IP was used in a >> number of NXP/Phillips chips besides the PNX4008/LPC32xx. I don't >> think there are any PNX4008's in the wild, and even working in >> NXP, I can't find any non-marketing reference material for that >> part (including the user manual). > > Thanks for the heads up. I'll apply both patches, then. Should I consider the two patches as applied now (where? i2c-embedded?), or should I resend? ;-) Thanks in advance, Roland From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756608Ab2ICUQ2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:16:28 -0400 Received: from antcom.de ([188.40.178.216]:41932 "EHLO chuck.antcom.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756371Ab2ICUQ0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:16:26 -0400 Message-ID: <50451016.7010608@antcom.de> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 22:16:22 +0200 From: Roland Stigge Organization: ANTCOM Open Source Research and Development User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:10.0.5) Gecko/20120624 Icedove/10.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wolfram Sang CC: Kevin Wells , "vitalywool@gmail.com" , "khali@linux-fr.org" , "ben-linux@fluff.org" , "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Srinivas Bakki , "aletes.xgr@gmail.com" , "jonsmirl@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] i2c: pnx: Fix bit definitions References: <1344411752-23469-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <20120818095108.GB24812@pengutronix.de> <5030A81E.5090508@antcom.de> <083DF309106F364B939360100EC290F823A0354A3D@eu1rdcrdc1wx030.exi.nxp.com> <20120820175527.GA9169@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20120820175527.GA9169@pengutronix.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Wolfram, On 20/08/12 19:55, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> I've never had my hands on a PNX4008 chip at NXP, but I do >> believe they are the same IP. That specific I2C IP was used in a >> number of NXP/Phillips chips besides the PNX4008/LPC32xx. I don't >> think there are any PNX4008's in the wild, and even working in >> NXP, I can't find any non-marketing reference material for that >> part (including the user manual). > > Thanks for the heads up. I'll apply both patches, then. Should I consider the two patches as applied now (where? i2c-embedded?), or should I resend? ;-) Thanks in advance, Roland