From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: UNBOUND -> REBIND morphing in rebind_workers() should be atomic
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:05:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5046A561.9050903@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120904233901.GC9092@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com>
On 09/05/2012 07:39 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>From d2ae38fc5e37b4bca3c4bec04a10dcf861a77b2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 00:28:19 +0800
>
> The compiler may compile the following code into TWO write/modify
> instructions.
>
> worker->flags &= ~WORKER_UNBOUND;
> worker->flags |= WORKER_REBIND;
>
> so the other CPU may temporarily see worker->flags which doesn't have
> either WORKER_UNBOUND or WORKER_REBIND set and perform local wakeup
> prematurely.
>
> Fix it by using single explicit assignment via ACCESS_ONCE().
>
> Because idle workers have another WORKER_NOT_RUNNING flag, this bug
> doesn't exist for them; however, update it to use the same pattern for
> consistency.
>
> tj: Applied the change to idle workers too and updated comments and
> patch description a bit.
Hi, tj
Thank you for accepting this one.
I'm waiting for your comments on the other patches.
I need to rebase the other patches(on top of wq/for-3.7 and this merged one),
but I think it is not good to seed to new version patchset without considering
your comments. so I'm still waiting. Or should I rebase them at first?
Thanks
Lai
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> Applied to wq/for-3.6-fixes with some modifications. Greg, this won't
> apply cleanly to -stable. Will post the backported version as a reply
> to this message.
>
> Thanks!
>
> kernel/workqueue.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 692d976..c462cd6 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -1396,12 +1396,15 @@ retry:
> /* set REBIND and kick idle ones, we'll wait for these later */
> for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) {
> list_for_each_entry(worker, &pool->idle_list, entry) {
> + unsigned long worker_flags = worker->flags;
> +
> if (worker->flags & WORKER_REBIND)
> continue;
>
> - /* morph UNBOUND to REBIND */
> - worker->flags &= ~WORKER_UNBOUND;
> - worker->flags |= WORKER_REBIND;
> + /* morph UNBOUND to REBIND atomically */
> + worker_flags &= ~WORKER_UNBOUND;
> + worker_flags |= WORKER_REBIND;
> + ACCESS_ONCE(worker->flags) = worker_flags;
>
> idle_rebind.cnt++;
> worker->idle_rebind = &idle_rebind;
> @@ -1434,10 +1437,12 @@ retry:
> /* rebind busy workers */
> for_each_busy_worker(worker, i, pos, gcwq) {
> struct work_struct *rebind_work = &worker->rebind_work;
> + unsigned long worker_flags = worker->flags;
>
> - /* morph UNBOUND to REBIND */
> - worker->flags &= ~WORKER_UNBOUND;
> - worker->flags |= WORKER_REBIND;
> + /* morph UNBOUND to REBIND atomically */
> + worker_flags &= ~WORKER_UNBOUND;
> + worker_flags |= WORKER_REBIND;
> + ACCESS_ONCE(worker->flags) = worker_flags;
>
> if (test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT,
> work_data_bits(rebind_work)))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-05 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-01 16:28 [PATCH 00/10 V4] workqueue: fix and cleanup hotplug/rebind_workers() Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-01 16:28 ` [PATCH 01/10 V4] workqueue: ensure the wq_worker_sleeping() see the right flags Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-04 23:39 ` [PATCH] workqueue: UNBOUND -> REBIND morphing in rebind_workers() should be atomic Tejun Heo
2012-09-04 23:58 ` [PATCH -stable] " Tejun Heo
2012-09-16 15:49 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-09-05 1:05 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2012-09-05 1:17 ` [PATCH] " Tejun Heo
2012-09-01 16:28 ` [PATCH 02/10 V4] workqueue: fix deadlock in rebind_workers() Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 0:54 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-05 1:28 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 1:33 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-01 16:28 ` [PATCH 03/10 V4] workqueue: add POOL_MANAGING_WORKERS Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-01 16:28 ` [PATCH 04/10 V4] workqueue: add manage_workers_slowpath() Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 1:12 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-06 1:55 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-01 16:28 ` [PATCH 05/10 V4] workqueue: move rebind_hold to idle_rebind Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-01 16:28 ` [PATCH 06/10 V4] workqueue: simple clear WORKER_REBIND Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-01 16:28 ` [PATCH 07/10 V4] workqueue: move idle_rebind pointer to gcwq Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-01 16:28 ` [PATCH 08/10 V4] workqueue: explicit way to wait for idles workers to finish Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-01 16:28 ` [PATCH 09/10] workqueue: single pass rebind_workers Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-01 16:28 ` [PATCH 10/10 V4] workqueue: merge the role of rebind_hold to idle_done Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 1:15 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-05 1:48 ` Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5046A561.9050903@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.