From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
gleb@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] kvm: Use a reserved IRQ source ID for irqfd
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 18:22:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50476E51.5020005@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120905151348.GC11058@redhat.com>
On 09/05/2012 06:13 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:59:46PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 09/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:35:43PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> >> On 08/22/2012 03:41 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I assumed you were pointing out the level vs edge interaction. If we
>> >> >> call that a userspace bug, I can just drop this. Thanks,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Alex
>> >> >
>> >> > level is userspace bug I think :)
>> >>
>> >> I don't see how it's a bug. Suppose we have a vfio device that shares a
>> >> gsi with an emulated device. The emulated device naturally uses
>> >> KVM_IRQ_LINE (it has no need to re-sample on ADN), while vfio naturally
>> >> has to use irqfd.
>> >
>> > Absolutely. But vfio needs to use irqfd with the new flag.
>> > Using existing irqfd for level is a bug.
>>
>> I see we're not reusing this irq source id for level irqfd. But I think
>> we should, there's no need for per-gsi irq source id.
>
> I agree. All resample irqfds are deasserted at the same time,
> tracking them separately gets us nothing.
That's not the reason. Separate irq source ids only have meanings
within a gsi. We could have two lines (gsi 3 isid 4) and (gsi 4 isid 4)
that can be toggled independently with no effect on the other gsi.
Within a gsi we do need a separate irq source id usually, but as 2/2
recognizes, AODNs are a special case since we clear all inputs anyway.
The end result is that all AODNs can share a single isid.
>
>> Plus I'd like to
>> fix the theoretical bug even if it doesn't bite in practice.
>>
>
> I'm not sure what the bug is, for edge, and how a separate ID fixes it.
> Could you clarify?
gsi 3 is configured as edge in the ioapic. It has (unusually) two
inputs: one driven by userspace, the other by irqfd.
cpu 0 cpu 1
------------------------ -------------------------
irqfd: set to 1
ioapic: recognize edge
inject irq
EOI
KVM_IRQ_LINE: set to 1
ioapic: ignore
KVM_IRQ_LINE: set to 0
irqfd: set to 0
We had two edges with an EOI between them, but injected just on interrupt.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-05 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-21 19:28 [PATCH v9 0/2] kvm: level irqfd support Alex Williamson
2012-08-21 19:29 ` [PATCH v9 1/2] kvm: Use a reserved IRQ source ID for irqfd Alex Williamson
2012-08-21 19:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-21 20:06 ` Alex Williamson
2012-08-21 20:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-21 21:14 ` Alex Williamson
2012-08-22 0:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-22 1:34 ` Alex Williamson
2012-09-05 14:35 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-05 14:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-05 14:59 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-05 15:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-05 15:22 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-09-05 15:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-05 15:35 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-05 15:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-05 15:12 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-05 15:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-05 14:46 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-05 15:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-05 15:15 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-21 19:29 ` [PATCH v9 2/2] kvm: On Ack, De-assert & Notify KVM_IRQFD extension Alex Williamson
2012-08-21 20:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-21 21:11 ` Alex Williamson
2012-08-22 0:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-22 1:48 ` Alex Williamson
2012-09-05 14:57 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-17 16:13 ` Alex Williamson
2012-08-22 0:31 ` [PATCH v9 0/2] kvm: level irqfd support Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-22 1:28 ` Alex Williamson
2012-08-22 8:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-17 18:08 ` Alex Williamson
2012-08-22 10:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-05 14:42 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-05 14:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50476E51.5020005@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.