From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eumx.net ([91.82.101.43]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9I1k-0002wZ-JJ for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 18:00:28 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51227 helo=eumx.net) by eumx.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9Hpl-0000tn-8Z for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:48:05 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=eumx.net; h=message-id :date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=lzr+u9kL27QeG6Yw298RvBjBbjk=; b=I+E5gzX+gVVCWeVQlrfSifHUIaxC S7VRwS0ofYjcaX9p2AqgxdHmWcvru7RMbHxEp1Z2DUsuDbEOmRtSD3MsVZl2e/De OmuIwA1xzcTd4aVavFQA61/1wmg7+pZSxllV82vAfLKOJlTqiRvMWdqX57el62af 9jGri+c4IXNogxI= Received: from [195.171.99.130] (port=48478 helo=[192.168.0.33]) by eumx.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9Hpl-0000te-6O for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:48:05 +0000 Message-ID: <50477479.70400@communistcode.co.uk> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:49:13 +0100 From: Jack Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1346858494-4849-1-git-send-email-ml@communistcode.co.uk> <1346858494-4849-2-git-send-email-ml@communistcode.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 2/3] liblockdev: new recipe, new version of libcec requires it X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:00:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/09/12 16:41, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 6:21 PM, wrote: > >> From: Jack Mitchell >> >> V4 >> >> - Remove debian packaging patch, it is not needed >> >> > What means it is not needed anymore? Included in upstream? Fixed in yocto? > > >> Signed-off-by: Jack Mitchell >> --- >> .../liblockdev/liblockdev_1.0.3.bb | 26 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-extended/liblockdev/ >> liblockdev_1.0.3.bb >> >> > Where is the removed patch? > > >> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/liblockdev/liblockdev_1.0.3.bbb/meta-oe/recipes-extended/liblockdev/ >> liblockdev_1.0.3.bb >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..be5ce44 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/liblockdev/liblockdev_1.0.3.bb >> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ >> +DESCRIPTION = "Manage character and block device lockfiles." >> +HOMEPAGE = " >> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=lockdev/lockdev.git;a=summary" >> + >> +LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1" >> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=d8045f3b8f929c1cb29a1e3fd737b499" >> + >> +PV = "1.0.3" >> + >> +SRC_URI = " >> http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/lockdev/lockdev_${PV}.orig.tar.gz >> " >> + >> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "64b9c1b87b125fc348e892e24625524a" >> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = >> "ccae635d7ac3fdd50897eceb250872b3d9a191d298f213e7f0c836910d869f82" >> + >> +S = "${WORKDIR}/lockdev-${PV}" >> + >> +do_compile() { >> + oe_runmake CC="${CC}" LD="${LD}" shared >> +} >> + >> +do_install() { >> + oe_runmake basedir="${D}" incdir="${D}${includedir}" >> libdir="${D}${libdir}" install_dev >> +} >> + >> +FILES_{PN} = "${includedir}/* \ >> + ${libdir}/* \ >> +" >> -- >> 1.7.12 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >> > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel Sorry, this has been confusing! I had erroneously added a patch in my V1 git send-patch for building liblockdev which wasn't required so I removed it and rebased my patches without it. -- Jack Mitchell (jack@embed.me.uk) Embedded Systems Engineer http://www.embed.me.uk --