From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37817) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9ZNZ-0003Xs-Vy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 06:32:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9ZNU-00007p-A4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 06:32:09 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:54791 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9ZNU-00007j-3g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 06:32:04 -0400 Message-ID: <50487BA1.6040608@suse.de> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:32:01 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1346515062-13067-1-git-send-email-Don@CloudSwitch.com> <1346628158-30403-1-git-send-email-Don@CloudSwitch.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] CHECKPATCH: Add warning for single else statement. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: Don Slutz , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 05.09.2012 21:46, schrieb Blue Swirl: > Thanks, applied all. Question: Are additions to checkpatch.pl supposed to be in QEMU Coding Style as done here? Do you plan to convert it consistently then? checkpatch.pl uses tabs consistently, making checkpatch.pl complain. ;) The alternative would be to stick to upstream formatting and exempt checkpatch.pl from its own checks. Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC= rnberg