From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Christian_K=F6nig?= <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH libdrm 1/3] radeon: Fix layout of linear aligned mipmaps
	on SI.
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:15:03 +0200
Message-ID: <5048A1D7.2060907@vodafone.de>
References: <1346928819-5202-1-git-send-email-michel@daenzer.net>
	<50488CFB.7010103@vodafone.de>
	<1346936496.30263.172.camel@thor.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from outgoing.email.vodafone.de (outgoing.email.vodafone.de
	[139.7.28.128])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9199E97C
	for <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Thu,  6 Sep 2012 06:15:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1346936496.30263.172.camel@thor.local>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michel_D=E4nzer?= <michel@daenzer.net>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

On 06.09.2012 15:01, Michel D=E4nzer wrote:
> On Don, 2012-09-06 at 13:46 +0200, Christian K=F6nig wrote:
>> On 06.09.2012 12:53, Michel D=E4nzer wrote:
>>> From: Michel D=E4nzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michel D=E4nzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
>> Sounds good to me, but shouldn't we also increase the version number?
> Assuming you mean the libdrm package version, I don't think it's worth
> doing that just for these fixes. At this point, one should always use
> latest Git of mesa and libdrm for radeonsi. But of course, once a libdrm
> release is out with these fixes, we can require that as the minimum
> version for radeonsi.
Ok, that makes sense.

>> Anyway: Reviewed-by: Christian K=F6nig <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Thanks, is that for the whole series?

Yes it is, and also for the four patches to radeonsi which depends on =

this change.

Christian.