From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Glauber Costa Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: first step towards hierarchical controller Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:45:05 +0400 Message-ID: <5049C221.4030003@parallels.com> References: <20120904143552.GB15683@dhcp22.suse.cz> <50461241.5010300@parallels.com> <20120904145414.GC15683@dhcp22.suse.cz> <50461610.30305@parallels.com> <20120904162501.GE15683@dhcp22.suse.cz> <504709D4.2010800@parallels.com> <20120905144942.GH5388@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20120905201238.GE13737@google.com> <20120906120623.GE22426@dhcp22.suse.cz> <50489270.7060108@parallels.com> <20120906121842.GG22426@dhcp22.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120906121842.GG22426-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Michal Hocko Cc: Tejun Heo , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, Dave Jones , Ben Hutchings , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Turner , Lennart Poettering , Kay Sievers , Kamezawa Hiroyuki , Johannes Weiner On 09/06/2012 04:18 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> Just so I understand it: >> > >> > Michal clearly objected before folding his patch with my Kconfig patch. >> > But is there still opposition to merge both? > I do not find the config option very much useful but if others feel it > really is I won't block it. > Tejun, what is your take on this? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx172.postini.com [74.125.245.172]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C2376B0068 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 05:48:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5049C221.4030003@parallels.com> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:45:05 +0400 From: Glauber Costa MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: first step towards hierarchical controller References: <20120904143552.GB15683@dhcp22.suse.cz> <50461241.5010300@parallels.com> <20120904145414.GC15683@dhcp22.suse.cz> <50461610.30305@parallels.com> <20120904162501.GE15683@dhcp22.suse.cz> <504709D4.2010800@parallels.com> <20120905144942.GH5388@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20120905201238.GE13737@google.com> <20120906120623.GE22426@dhcp22.suse.cz> <50489270.7060108@parallels.com> <20120906121842.GG22426@dhcp22.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20120906121842.GG22426@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: Tejun Heo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Dave Jones , Ben Hutchings , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Turner , Lennart Poettering , Kay Sievers , Kamezawa Hiroyuki , Johannes Weiner On 09/06/2012 04:18 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> Just so I understand it: >> > >> > Michal clearly objected before folding his patch with my Kconfig patch. >> > But is there still opposition to merge both? > I do not find the config option very much useful but if others feel it > really is I won't block it. > Tejun, what is your take on this? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760315Ab2IGJsc (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2012 05:48:32 -0400 Received: from mx2.parallels.com ([64.131.90.16]:49618 "EHLO mx2.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760239Ab2IGJsa (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2012 05:48:30 -0400 Message-ID: <5049C221.4030003@parallels.com> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:45:05 +0400 From: Glauber Costa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michal Hocko CC: Tejun Heo , , , , Dave Jones , Ben Hutchings , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Turner , Lennart Poettering , Kay Sievers , Kamezawa Hiroyuki , Johannes Weiner Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: first step towards hierarchical controller References: <20120904143552.GB15683@dhcp22.suse.cz> <50461241.5010300@parallels.com> <20120904145414.GC15683@dhcp22.suse.cz> <50461610.30305@parallels.com> <20120904162501.GE15683@dhcp22.suse.cz> <504709D4.2010800@parallels.com> <20120905144942.GH5388@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20120905201238.GE13737@google.com> <20120906120623.GE22426@dhcp22.suse.cz> <50489270.7060108@parallels.com> <20120906121842.GG22426@dhcp22.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20120906121842.GG22426@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/06/2012 04:18 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> Just so I understand it: >> > >> > Michal clearly objected before folding his patch with my Kconfig patch. >> > But is there still opposition to merge both? > I do not find the config option very much useful but if others feel it > really is I won't block it. > Tejun, what is your take on this?