All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Hypervisor memory leak/corruption because of guest irqs
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:04:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <504A371F.7000808@citrix.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2285 bytes --]

Hello,

I appear to have opened a can of worms here.  This was discovered when
turning on ASSERT()s, looking for another crash (and adding in 98 new
ASSERTs, along with some 'type checking' magic constants)

The issue has been discovered against Xen 4.1.3, but a cursory
inspection of unstable shows no signs of it being fixed. The relevant
assertion (which I added) is attached.  (In the process of debugging, I
also developed the ASSERT_PRINTK(bool, fmt, ...) macro which will be
upstreamed in due course.)

The root cause of the problem is the compelete abuse of the
irq_desc->action pointer being cast to a irq_guest_action_t* when
in-fact it is an irqaction*, but the (correct) solution is not easy.

destroy_irq() calls dynamic_irq_cleanup() which xfree()'s desc->action. 
This would be all well and fine if it were only an irqaction pointer. 
However, in this case, it is actually an irq_guest_action_t pointer,
meaning that we have free()'d an inactive timer, which is on a pcpu's
inactive timer linked list.  This means that as soon as the free()'d
memory is reused for something new, the linked list gets trashed, which
which point all bets are off with regards to the validity of hypervisor
memory.

As far as I can tell, this bug only manifests in combination with PCI
Passthrough, as we only perform cleanup of guest irqs when a domain with
passthrough is shut down.  The issue was first found by the ASSERT()s in
__list_del(), when something tried to use the pcpu inactive timer list,
after the free()'d memory was reused.

In this specific case, a quick and dirty hack would be to check every
time we free an action and possibly kill the timer if it is a guest irq.

Having said that, it is not a correct fix; the utter abuse of
irq_desc->action has been a ticking timebomb for a long time. 
irq_guest_action_t is private to the 2nd half of irq.c(x86), whereas
irqaction is common and architecture independent.  The only acceptable
solution I see is to re-architect a substantial proportion of the irq code.

Am I missing something obvious? or is the best way to continue (in which
case I have my work cut out as, it is currently affecting XenServer
customers) ?

-- 
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com


[-- Attachment #2: hypervisor-panic.log --]
[-- Type: text/x-log, Size: 4504 bytes --]

(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:18] Assertion '! (t->status == 1 || t->status == 3 || t->status == 4)' failed, line 229, file irq.c
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:18] will free action with timer in status 1
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:18] Xen BUG at irq.c:229
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:18] ----[ Xen-4.1.3  x86_64  debug=n  Tainted:    C ]----
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:18] CPU:    0
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:18] RIP:    e008:[<ffff82c48016d89e>] destroy_irq+0x1ae/0x210
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:18] RFLAGS: 0000000000010082   CONTEXT: hypervisor
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:18] rax: 0000000000000000   rbx: ffff83083fe04800   rcx: 0000000000000000
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:19] rdx: 000000000000000a   rsi: 000000000000000a   rdi: ffff82c4802662c4
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:19] rbp: ffff830993cd77f0   rsp: ffff82c4802b7d88   r8:  0000000000000000
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:19] r9:  0000000000000000   r10: 00000000ffffffff   r11: ffff82c480141560
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:19] r12: 000000000000008f   r13: ffff83083fe04834   r14: 0000000000000286
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:19] r15: ffff830993cd7810   cr0: 0000000080050033   cr4: 00000000000026f0
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:19] cr3: 00000008369ae000   cr2: 00000000e9925e68
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:19] ds: 007b   es: 007b   fs: 00d8   gs: 0033   ss: 0000   cs: e008
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:19] Xen stack trace from rsp=ffff82c4802b7d88:
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:19]    0000000000000000 ffff8303c40757d0 ffff830895660000 000000000000004f
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:19]    ffff8303c40757d0 000000000000008f ffff83083fe04834 ffff82c480169647
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:20]    ffff8303c40757d0 ffff830895660000 000000000000004f ffff83083fe04800
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:20]    000000000000008f ffff82c48016e491 000000000000004f 000000000000013c
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:20]    000000000000008f ffff830895660000 000000000000004f 000000000000013c
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:20]    ffff830895660188 ffff82c4802d4600 0000000000000000 ffff82c48016e71a
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:20]    ffff830895660000 ffff8300be6ac000 ffff830895660000 00000000ffffffff
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:20]    ffff830895660000 ffff82c48015efb2 00000000ffffffff ffff8300be6ac000
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:20]    fffffffffffffff8 ffff82c480104a80 ffff82c4802f4060 0000000000000000
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:20]    0000000000000001 ffff82c4802f4320 ffff82c4802d0600 ffff82c480130191
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:20]    0000000000000000 ffffffffffffffff ffff82c4802b7f18 ffff82c480126f85
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:20]    ffff8300bf2d8000 00000000e98dde14 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:21]    0000000000000000 ffff82c480223b26 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:21]    0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000e98dde14 00000000e913584c
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:21]    0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:21]    0000000000000008 00000000e9135878 0000000000000000 00000000e9135854
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:21]    00000000e98ddec4 000000f900000000 00000000c01d68f9 0000000000000061
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:21]    0000000000000202 00000000e98dde0c 0000000000000069 0000000000000000
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:21]    0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:21]    ffff8300bf2d8000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:21] Xen call trace:
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:21]       [<ffff82c48016d89e>] destroy_irq+0x1ae/0x210
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:22]      7[<ffff82c480169647>] msi_free_irq+0x27/0x210
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:22]     13[<ffff82c48016e491>] unmap_domain_pirq+0x181/0x3b0
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:22]     23[<ffff82c48016e71a>] free_domain_pirqs+0x5a/0x90
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:22]     29[<ffff82c48015efb2>] arch_domain_destroy+0x32/0x330
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:22]     33[<ffff82c480104a80>] complete_domain_destroy+0x80/0x150
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:22]     39[<ffff82c480130191>] rcu_process_callbacks+0xa1/0x200
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:22]     43[<ffff82c480126f85>] __do_softirq+0x65/0x90
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:22]     49[<ffff82c480223b26>] compat_process_softirqs+0x6/0x10
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:22]    
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:22] 
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:22] ****************************************
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:22] Panic on CPU 0:
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:22] Xen BUG at irq.c:229
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:22] ****************************************
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:23] 
(XEN) [2012-09-07 11:35:23] Manual reset required ('noreboot' specified)

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2012-09-07 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-07 18:04 Andrew Cooper [this message]
2012-09-07 18:42 ` Hypervisor memory leak/corruption because of guest irqs Keir Fraser
2012-09-07 19:08   ` Andrew Cooper
2012-09-10 12:59     ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=504A371F.7000808@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.