All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com (Mark Langsdorf)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC] clk: use spinlock for clk_get_rate
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 13:58:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <504A43D0.7060406@calxeda.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5049EFE5.4080002@calxeda.com>

> From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
>
> A nested locking issue is seen on imx6q (CA9 Quad) as below when cpufreq
> driver is running.  It looks like the issue is caused by a simultaneous
> call to clk_get_rate from two smp_twd threads.
> 
> 1) cpu0_set_target
>      cpufreq_notify_transition
>        ...
>          twd_cpufreq_transition
>            twd_update_frequency
>              clk_get_rate
> 
> 2) do_exit
>      kernel_init
>        smp_prepare_cpus
>          percpu_timer_setup
>            twd_timer_setup
>              clk_get_rate
> 
> The patch "clk: new locking scheme for reentrancy" does not help the
> issue.  I'm not sure if this is an issue that should be fixed in
> smp_twd driver or it's an use case which should be supported by clk API.
> 
> Looking at clk_get_rate() API, it just reads a cached clock rate and
> should be fast enough to hold a spinlock than mutex.  It's a quick
> fix to the issue, but I'm not really sure it's the correct one. That's
> why this is a RFC patch.

I was seeing a similar issue while developing cpufreq support for the
Calxeda Highbank SoC. This patch seems to have resolved the issue. I
don't know if it's correct, but it works for me.

--Mark Langsdorf
Calxeda, Inc.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-07 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-06  8:12 [PATCH RFC] clk: use spinlock for clk_get_rate Shawn Guo
2012-09-06  9:28 ` Ulf Hansson
2012-09-06 15:31   ` Shawn Guo
2012-09-07  8:03 ` Shawn Guo
     [not found] ` <5049EFE5.4080002@calxeda.com>
2012-09-07 18:58   ` Mark Langsdorf [this message]
2012-09-07 21:22     ` Mike Turquette
2012-09-07 21:16 ` Mike Turquette

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=504A43D0.7060406@calxeda.com \
    --to=mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.