From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gerg@snapgear.com (Greg Ungerer) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 14:40:25 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: ks8695: add board support for the OpenGear boards based on the KS8695 In-Reply-To: References: <1346996139-5692-1-git-send-email-gerg@snapgear.com> <201209071221.56938.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <504C1DB9.2020305@snapgear.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Olof, On 09/08/2012 01:20 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Friday 07 September 2012, gerg at snapgear.com wrote: >>> From: Greg Ungerer >>> >>> A number of boards produced by OpenGear and based on the Micrel KS8695 SoC. >>> Add board support to the KS8695 kernel code to support them. >>> >>> The following machine type entries will need to be added back into the >>> mach-types file with these in mainline: >>> >>> cm4008 MACH_CM4008 CM4008 624 >>> cm41xx MACH_CM41XX CM41XX 672 >>> cm4002 MACH_CM4002 CM4002 876 >>> im42xx MACH_IM42XX IM42XX 1105 >>> im4004 MACH_IM4004 IM4004 1400 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer >> >> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > > Both patches applied to a ks8695/boards branch, part of next/boards in arm-soc. > > Greg, you should submit separate patch to add the machine types to > Russell's patch tracker. Yep, I'll create some patches for those. > We are of course looking forward to efforts > to move these platforms to device tree, since we want to avoid adding > non-dt boards from here on out. Yes that would be nice. I am not sure when I will have some time to take that on. But hopefully sometime soon. Regards Greg -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg at snapgear.com SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888 8 Gardner Close, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630 Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com