From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eumx.net ([91.82.101.43]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TB4xr-00071B-O8 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:27:51 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52899 helo=eumx.net) by eumx.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TB4lm-0004P6-9l for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:15:22 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=eumx.net; h=message-id :date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=rVEzZBufWQDblgy67tXvBUCLNKw=; b=o62bs8+v7CQOMcHR6vDHIDQV09XM +/j1Txv7ELjHU2DN/nWqS7np7MCSguN1oXsKSyTY8TvAqvCnuey4DFG8pR+luz60 5RcJ7EWJg8CSDdbvBFF71rRlx++DXVBXVVQCT8guUmrIB0G9GxTBG4YKLuVTX+/b iIByUlG+yZ8OTso= Received: from [195.171.99.130] (port=9707 helo=[192.168.0.40]) by eumx.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TB4lm-0004Ov-7e for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:15:22 +0000 Message-ID: <504DF65B.4080805@communistcode.co.uk> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:16:59 +0100 From: Jack Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <504DE45C.2010202@communistcode.co.uk> <1347282537.2673.239.camel@phil-desktop> In-Reply-To: <1347282537.2673.239.camel@phil-desktop> Subject: Re: Couple of autotools configure problems X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:27:52 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/09/12 14:08, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 14:00 +0100, Jack Mitchell wrote: >> What is a portable version of ':=', maybe '+='? I can't get anything but >> unrelated hits from Google. > I don't think there is any portable equivalent. However, if you know > you will always be using GNU make then the portability is something of a > non-issue. > > You could work around it by just not passing -Werror -Wall to automake. > > p. > Ok, re-building now - will let you know how it goes. I removed the -Wall flag. It makes no sense at all as the -Wall flag is passed using the := operator, is that not a contradiction in itself?! -- Jack Mitchell (jack@embed.me.uk) Embedded Systems Engineer http://www.embed.me.uk --