All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@systemhalted.org>
To: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>
Cc: Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Thread stack allocation
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:13:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <504E03AF.2070204@systemhalted.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP297D308BBF8A72A121C16397AD0@phx.gbl>

On 9/9/2012 6:24 PM, John David Anglin wrote:
> On 9-Sep-12, at 4:23 PM, John David Anglin wrote:
> 
>> It seems to me this must be a kernel bug:
> 
> Nope, it's a problem with guard page allocation in openjdk.
> It assumes stack grows down.

Yes, that's wrong :-)

If you allocate your own stacks then glibc can't setup guard
pages for you since it violates some POSIX constraints.

For avoidance of doubt you *can* get a thread with PTHREAD_STACK_MIN
as the stack size if:

(a) RLIMIT_STACK is a useful value e.g. != infinity

... but ....

(b) RLIMIT_STACK < PTHREAD_STACK_MIN

.... then ....

We allocate PTHREAD_STACK_MIN by default which might not be enough
space for what you need.

I'm actually working heavily on a BZ for glibc that would split up
the accounting of stack space and other incidentals to avoid grouping
them. For example if you had a lot of TLS variables they could actually
consume your stack and that's wrong.

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11787

Cheers,
Carlos.


  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-10 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-09 17:52 Thread stack allocation John David Anglin
2012-09-09 20:23 ` John David Anglin
2012-09-09 22:24   ` John David Anglin
2012-09-10 15:13     ` Carlos O'Donell [this message]
2012-09-10 15:45       ` John David Anglin
2012-09-10 19:02         ` Carlos O'Donell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=504E03AF.2070204@systemhalted.org \
    --to=carlos@systemhalted.org \
    --cc=dave.anglin@bell.net \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.