From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] drm: edid: add support for E-DDC
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:46:01 -0400
Message-ID: <504E3569.9070002@redhat.com>
References: <1346310246-21412-1-git-send-email-s.shirish@samsung.com>
	<1346310246-21412-2-git-send-email-s.shirish@samsung.com>
	<CAE=Z4VDVsO794LzQmV--cmFagSFLmtR-dPN8qd6TiPHA9te__A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAE=Z4VDwuLF+K+rQjTWR4r4NWu7r1yjxzDjJt_x5AUcibztxsA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPM=9tx=6RLmpLaXmtn9u4NMHKEgEVYPoDAqPoq7wwwqLMm_aA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9719F664
	for <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:46:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPM=9tx=6RLmpLaXmtn9u4NMHKEgEVYPoDAqPoq7wwwqLMm_aA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel>,
	<mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

On 9/8/12 6:35 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Shirish S <shirish.s12@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>> Gentle Reminder!
>> This patch is required for passing the very first test case of HDMI
>> Compliance test suite.
>> Regards,
>> Shirish S
>
> Can you provide ajax with the sample he asked for previously?

He did, it even looks like I expected it to look: a (correct) block map 
and two CEA extension blocks.  Which I think means there are now ways 
two successive CEA blocks could disagree with each other, so that's 
probably something to audit, but I don't expect that to be common.

- ajax