From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Masters Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/31] AArch64 Linux kernel port Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:22:38 -0400 Message-ID: <504E4C0E.9030402@jonmasters.org> References: <1347035226-18649-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:20107 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758356Ab2IJUWx (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:22:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1347035226-18649-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Catalin Marinas Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann On 09/07/2012 12:26 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > This is the 3rd version of patches implementing Linux kernel support for > the 64-bit ARM architecture. > ...but the main goal was to freeze the user ABI. Is the consensus now that we're good from an ABI viewpoint? Jon. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jonathan@jonmasters.org (Jon Masters) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:22:38 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v3 00/31] AArch64 Linux kernel port In-Reply-To: <1347035226-18649-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com> References: <1347035226-18649-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com> Message-ID: <504E4C0E.9030402@jonmasters.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 09/07/2012 12:26 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > This is the 3rd version of patches implementing Linux kernel support for > the 64-bit ARM architecture. > ...but the main goal was to freeze the user ABI. Is the consensus now that we're good from an ABI viewpoint? Jon.