From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Hao, Xudong" <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>,
"Joerg.Roedel@amd.com" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kvm/fpu: Enable fully eager restore kvm FPU
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:54:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <504EEE29.9040309@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <403610A45A2B5242BD291EDAE8B37D300FEBF5A2@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 09/11/2012 09:43 AM, Hao, Xudong wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Avi Kivity [mailto:avi@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:07 PM
>> To: Hao, Xudong
>> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Xiantao; Joerg.Roedel@amd.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kvm/fpu: Enable fully eager restore kvm FPU
>>
>> >
>> > Avi, I'm not sure if I fully understand of you. Do you mean enter guest with a
>> fpu_active=0 and then fpu does not restore?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> > If so, I will add fpu_active=1 in the no-lazy case.
>> >
>> > - kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_DEACTIVATE_FPU, vcpu);
>> > + if (kvm_read_cr4_bits(vcpu, X86_CR4_OSXSAVE) &&
>> > + (vcpu->arch.xcr0 & ~((u64)KVM_XSTATE_LAZY))) {
>> > + kvm_x86_ops->fpu_activate(vcpu);
>> > + vcpu->fpu_active=1;
>> > + }
>> > + else
>> > + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_DEACTIVATE_FPU, vcpu);
>> >
>>
>> It doesn't help here.
>>
>> 1 guest boot
>> 2 kvm_userspace_exit (deactivates fpu)
>> 3 XSETBV exit that sets xcr0.new_bit
>> 4 kvm_enter
>>
>> There is no call to kvm_put_guest_fpu() between 3 and 4, you need
>> something in __kvm_set_xcr() to activate the fpu.
>>
>
> Yes, it's code path when enable xsave in guest, I'll add fpu activate there and remain v2 patch in kvm_put_guest_fpu().
>
> @@ -554,6 +554,8 @@ int __kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 xcr)
> xcr0 = xcr;
> if (kvm_x86_ops->get_cpl(vcpu) != 0)
> return 1;
> + if (xcr0 & ~((u64)KVM_XSTATE_LAZY))
> + kvm_x86_ops->fpu_activate(vcpu);
> if (!(xcr0 & XSTATE_FP))
> return 1;
> if ((xcr0 & XSTATE_YMM) && !(xcr0 & XSTATE_SSE))
>
>> Note you also need to consider writes to xcr0 and cr4 that happen in the
>> reverse order due to live migration.
>>
>
> I'm confused of this, doesn't setting cr4 firstly then xcr0?
> Do you mean current live migration has a reverse order, or it must be a reverse order with my eager restore patch?
I mean I want the code to work regardless of whether KVM_SET_SREGS or
KVM_SET_XCRS is called first.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-11 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-05 1:26 [PATCH v2] kvm/fpu: Enable fully eager restore kvm FPU Xudong Hao
2012-09-05 13:12 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-06 2:13 ` Hao, Xudong
2012-09-06 8:16 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-10 3:29 ` Hao, Xudong
2012-09-10 8:07 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-11 6:43 ` Hao, Xudong
2012-09-11 7:54 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-09-11 9:20 ` Hao, Xudong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=504EEE29.9040309@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=Joerg.Roedel@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiantao.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.