From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cyril@ti.com (Cyril Chemparathy) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:41:41 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: avoid undef on ARCH_HAS_READ_CURRENT_TIMER In-Reply-To: <20120911192820.GT13739@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1347380341-28145-1-git-send-email-cyril@ti.com> <20120911162522.GE32234@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <504F6DFB.5030208@ti.com> <20120911172018.GG32234@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <504F74C5.2020805@ti.com> <20120911175332.GI32234@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <504F836D.6050302@ti.com> <20120911192820.GT13739@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <504F93F5.3070702@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 9/11/2012 3:28 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 02:31:09PM -0400, Cyril Chemparathy wrote: >> On 9/11/2012 1:53 PM, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 06:28:37PM +0100, Cyril Chemparathy wrote: >>>> I can re-verify with the respun 7530/1 if you'd like. >>> >>> Sure, submitted as 7533/1: >>> >>> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=7533/1 >>> >> >> Works great. > > Cyril, I notice you're trying repeatedly to get a new password out of > the system. > > TI's mail system is known to silently drop the password reminders. > > Please bug your IT provider about this, there's nothing I can do about > it at my end - (and as such you won't receive a password reminder until > something can be done about this.) > *Sigh* Thanks Russell. I'll try to poke folks to see if this can be fixed. > 2012-09-11 19:45:53 1TBVT2-0008P4-2U => cyril at ti.com R=verp_domain_dnslookup T=verp_domain_smtp S=1041 H=ti.com.s9a1.psmtp.com [74.125.148.10] X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256 DN="/C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=*.psmtp.com" C="250 Thanks" > 2012-09-11 20:14:27 1TBVuf-0008S4-EC => cyril at ti.com R=verp_domain_dnslookup T=verp_domain_smtp S=1041 H=ti.com.s9a1.psmtp.com [74.125.148.10] X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256 DN="/C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google Inc/CN=*.psmtp.com" C="250 Thanks" > > (Note that *.psmtp.com seems to actually be more trouble than its > worth... previous history has shown it to be quite broken, silently > dropping _real_ emails as well. I'd call it an anti-HAM service rather > than an anti-SPAM service. The more people complain to Google about it > the better chance it will get fixed.) > -- Thanks - Cyril