From: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
To: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rbd: encapsulate code that gets snapshot info
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:14:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <504FC5D1.3000008@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <504A4A17.8060008@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
On 09/07/2012 12:25 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
> Create a function that encapsulates looking up the name, size and
> features related to a given snapshot, which is indicated by its
> index in an rbd device's snapshot context array of snapshot ids.
>
> This interface will be used to hide differences between the format 1
> and format 2 images.
>
> At the moment this (looking up the name anyway) is slightly less
> efficient than what's done currently, but we may be able to optimize
> this a bit later on by cacheing the last lookup if it proves to be a
> problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/rbd.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> index c62d3f4..e6b8fa6 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> @@ -2097,6 +2097,25 @@ err:
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
> }
>
> +static char *rbd_dev_v1_snap_info(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev, u32 which,
> + u64 *snap_size, u64 *snap_features)
> +{
> + char *snap_name;
> +
> + rbd_assert(which < rbd_dev->header.snapc->num_snaps);
> +
> + *snap_size = rbd_dev->header.snap_sizes[which];
> + *snap_features = 0; /* No features for v1 */
> +
> + /* Skip over names until we find the one we are looking for */
> +
> + snap_name = rbd_dev->header.snap_names;
> + while (which--)
> + snap_name += strlen(snap_name) + 1;
> +
> + return snap_name;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Scan the rbd device's current snapshot list and compare it to the
> * newly-received snapshot context. Remove any existing snapshots
> @@ -2113,7 +2132,6 @@ static int rbd_dev_snaps_update(struct rbd_device
> *rbd_dev)
> {
> struct ceph_snap_context *snapc = rbd_dev->header.snapc;
> const u32 snap_count = snapc->num_snaps;
> - char *snap_name = rbd_dev->header.snap_names;
> struct list_head *head = &rbd_dev->snaps;
> struct list_head *links = head->next;
> u32 index = 0;
> @@ -2122,6 +2140,9 @@ static int rbd_dev_snaps_update(struct rbd_device
> *rbd_dev)
> while (index < snap_count || links != head) {
> u64 snap_id;
> struct rbd_snap *snap;
> + char *snap_name;
> + u64 snap_size = 0;
> + u64 snap_features = 0;
>
> snap_id = index < snap_count ? snapc->snaps[index]
> : CEPH_NOSNAP;
> @@ -2148,16 +2169,20 @@ static int rbd_dev_snaps_update(struct
> rbd_device *rbd_dev)
> continue;
> }
>
> + snap_name = rbd_dev_v1_snap_info(rbd_dev, index,
> + &snap_size, &snap_features);
> + if (IS_ERR(snap_name))
> + return PTR_ERR(snap_name);
> +
> dout("entry %u: snap_id = %llu\n", (unsigned int) snap_count,
> (unsigned long long) snap_id);
> if (!snap || (snap_id != CEPH_NOSNAP && snap->id < snap_id)) {
> - struct rbd_image_header *header = &rbd_dev->header;
> struct rbd_snap *new_snap;
>
> /* We haven't seen this snapshot before */
>
> new_snap = __rbd_add_snap_dev(rbd_dev, snap_name,
> - snap_id, header->snap_sizes[index], 0);
> + snap_id, snap_size, snap_features);
> if (IS_ERR(new_snap)) {
> int err = PTR_ERR(new_snap);
>
> @@ -2178,9 +2203,9 @@ static int rbd_dev_snaps_update(struct rbd_device
> *rbd_dev)
>
> dout(" already present\n");
>
> - rbd_assert(snap->size ==
> - rbd_dev->header.snap_sizes[index]);
> + rbd_assert(snap->size == snap_size);
> rbd_assert(!strcmp(snap->name, snap_name));
> + rbd_assert(snap->features == snap_features);
>
> /* Done with this list entry; advance */
>
> @@ -2190,7 +2215,6 @@ static int rbd_dev_snaps_update(struct rbd_device
> *rbd_dev)
> /* Advance to the next entry in the snapshot context */
>
> index++;
> - snap_name += strlen(snap_name) + 1;
> }
> dout("%s: done\n", __func__);
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-11 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-07 19:22 [PATCH 0/3] rbd: hide some snapshot info details Alex Elder
2012-09-07 19:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] rbd: don't use index in __rbd_add_snap_dev() Alex Elder
2012-09-11 22:49 ` Josh Durgin
2012-09-07 19:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] rbd: add an rbd features field Alex Elder
2012-09-11 22:58 ` Josh Durgin
2012-09-07 19:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] rbd: encapsulate code that gets snapshot info Alex Elder
2012-09-11 23:14 ` Josh Durgin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=504FC5D1.3000008@inktank.com \
--to=josh.durgin@inktank.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=elder@inktank.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.