From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: eranian@google.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, mingo@elte.hu,
andi@firstfloor.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] perf tool: Allow wildcard in PMU name
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:30:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <504FE5AB.4060406@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120911140549.GC3800@krava.brq.redhat.com>
On 09/11/2012 10:05 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:53:51PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
>>
>
> SNIP
>
>> +int parse_events_add_pmu(struct list_head **_list, int *idx,
>> char *name, struct list_head *head_config)
>> {
>> struct perf_event_attr attr;
>> - struct perf_pmu *pmu;
>> + struct list_head *list;
>> + struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
>> + struct perf_evsel *evsel, *first = NULL;
>> + int orig_idx = *idx;
>>
>> - pmu = perf_pmu__find(name);
>> - if (!pmu)
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + list = malloc(sizeof(*list));
>> + if (!list)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(list);
>
> list should be allocated only if (!*_list)) same as in add_event function
>
> I haven't test, but I think you'll leak/loose events if there's another pmu
> event defined after ','
>
I think *_list is always NULL, because the code in parse-event.y is:
---
PE_NAME '/' event_config '/'
{
struct parse_events_data__events *data = _data;
struct list_head *list = NULL;
ABORT_ON(parse_events_add_pmu(&list, &data->idx, $1, $3));
parse_events__free_terms($3);
$$ = list;
}
---
Regards
Yan, Zheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-12 1:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-10 7:53 [RFC PATCH 1/3] perf: Add cpumask for uncore pmu Yan, Zheng
2012-09-10 7:53 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] perf/x86: " Yan, Zheng
2012-09-19 15:26 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Yan, Zheng
2012-09-10 7:53 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] perf tool: Make perf-stat check PMU cpumask file Yan, Zheng
2012-09-19 15:26 ` [tip:perf/core] perf stat: Check " tip-bot for Yan, Zheng
2012-09-10 7:53 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] perf tool: Allow wildcard in PMU name Yan, Zheng
2012-09-11 13:50 ` Jiri Olsa
2012-09-11 14:05 ` Jiri Olsa
2012-09-12 1:30 ` Yan, Zheng [this message]
2012-09-12 9:03 ` Jiri Olsa
2012-09-11 14:27 ` Jiri Olsa
2012-09-17 15:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-09-18 3:11 ` Yan, Zheng
2012-09-10 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] perf: Add cpumask for uncore pmu Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-10 23:10 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=504FE5AB.4060406@intel.com \
--to=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.