All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <50503BD4.7090604@redhat.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 9496787..5b66548 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ On 09/12/2012 09:07 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
 >> You replaced 16 to NR_VCPU_REGS in your patch, not (NR_VCPU_REGS-1).
 >> I guess it's a mistake in your commitlog, right?
 > 
-> 16 = (NR_VCPU_REGS-1). So I mean, if replacing 16 with (NR_VCPU_REGS-1),
+> 16 == (NR_VCPU_REGS-1). So I mean, if replacing 16 with (NR_VCPU_REGS-1),
 > there will be no behavior change for the x86_64 case. However I
 > *suspect* the right value is (NR_VCPU_REGS), as I said in the below
 > sentence.
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ On 09/12/2012 09:07 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
 >                 VCPU_REGS_R15 = 15,
 >         #endif 
 >                 VCPU_REGS_RIP,
-> =>             NR_VCPU_REGS
+> ==>             NR_VCPU_REGS
 >         };
 
 The right value is NR-1, since the loop excludes RIP.
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 9ad1674..cc649e8 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
  "ref\05050247E.3070905@redhat.com\0"
  "ref\020120912060710.GA24997@localhost\0"
  "From\0Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [kvm:next 1/1] arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:232 writeback_registers() error: buffer overflow 'ctxt->_r\0"
- "Date\0Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:37:56 +0000\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [kvm:next 1/1] arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:232 writeback_registers() error: buffer overflow 'ctxt->_regs' 9 <= 15\0"
+ "Date\0Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:37:56 +0300\0"
  "To\0Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>\0"
  "Cc\0Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com>"
   kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
  ">> You replaced 16 to NR_VCPU_REGS in your patch, not (NR_VCPU_REGS-1).\n"
  ">> I guess it's a mistake in your commitlog, right?\n"
  "> \n"
- "> 16 = (NR_VCPU_REGS-1). So I mean, if replacing 16 with (NR_VCPU_REGS-1),\n"
+ "> 16 == (NR_VCPU_REGS-1). So I mean, if replacing 16 with (NR_VCPU_REGS-1),\n"
  "> there will be no behavior change for the x86_64 case. However I\n"
  "> *suspect* the right value is (NR_VCPU_REGS), as I said in the below\n"
  "> sentence.\n"
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
  ">                 VCPU_REGS_R15 = 15,\n"
  ">         #endif \n"
  ">                 VCPU_REGS_RIP,\n"
- "> =>             NR_VCPU_REGS\n"
+ "> ==>             NR_VCPU_REGS\n"
  ">         };\n"
  "\n"
  "The right value is NR-1, since the loop excludes RIP.\n"
@@ -68,4 +68,4 @@
  "-- \n"
  error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
 
-7b20d789a4069c68d1dcc71cb808366d8670057a8658d4aa05c3d581006ace2f
+9d7270cb9210c899b23eccc67d51dfd4dc0b70005201416a78873de969efcff2

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.