From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Clemens Ladisch Subject: Re: Channel map API patches: to be 3.7 or not to be? Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:32:26 +0200 Message-ID: <5050B91A.7020303@ladisch.de> References: <504F2C65.1090204@ladisch.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98808261722 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:32:28 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Takashi Iwai wrote: >> Clemens Ladisch wrote: >>> Takashi Iwai wrote: >>>> is it useful to add SND_CHMAP_MONO, or is it just redundant? >>> >>> What would it be used for? > > Looking at PulseAudio and gstreamer codes, they seem to have explicit > MONO channel definition. > [...] > So, defining MONO seems rather standard. Now I'm inclined to define > SND_CHMAP_MONO... Okay; if they want it, they can get it ... Regards, Clemens