From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brad Figg Subject: Ubuntu Ext4 regression testing Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:52:49 -0700 Message-ID: <50511241.2090603@canonical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:43970 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751448Ab2ILWwx (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:52:53 -0400 Received: from static-50-53-107-235.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net ([50.53.107.235] helo=[192.168.1.4]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBvnf-0006zO-Ks for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 22:52:51 +0000 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: The Ubuntu kernel team has been putting some automated testing infrastructure in place. We are very interested in engaging with the appropriate upstream developers. We have been running the xfstests that come as part of the autotest testing framework. Some of these tests fail or never complete when run against an Ext4 file-system. Our initial questions are: 1. Is this an appropriate set of tests to be run as regression tests? 2. Is there a list of the xfstests that are appropriate for Ext4? 3. Are there additional regression tests that would be beneficial to the Linux community for us to be running? Test results can be found at: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/index.html Thanks Brad -- Brad Figg brad.figg@canonical.com http://www.canonical.com