From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, stefanha@gmail.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>,
pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/6] libqblock type and structure defines
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:33:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50515406.8020203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <505151D8.9030300@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1958 bytes --]
On 09/12/2012 09:24 PM, Wenchao Xia wrote:
> 于 2012-9-12 20:59, Eric Blake 写道:
>> On 09/11/2012 09:05 PM, Wenchao Xia wrote:
>>>> Seriously? We require a C99-compliant compiler, which is required to
>>>> treat the more compact version identically (all undefined names
>>>> evaluate
>>>> to 0 in the preprocessor), and HACKING doesn't mandate that we spell
>>>> out
>>>> a defined-ness check first. Okay, so configure adds -Wundef to the set
>>>> of CFLAGS, but I fail to see why we want -Wundef (that's an
>>>> anachronistic warning, only there to help you if you are writing code
>>>> portable to K&R).
>>>>
>>> So if the preprocessor replaced __GNUC__ to 0, is there difference
>>> between these two kinds of macoros?
>>> #if __GNUC__ >= 4
>>> #if defined(__GNUC__) && __GNUC__ >=4
>>
>> The only difference is whether -Wundef will warn, and I'm trying to
>> argue that qemu's current use of -Wundef is pointless, as that warning
>> exists solely for K&R compatibility, not for modern standard-compliant
>> code correctness.
>>
> OK ,then I think
> #if __GNUC__ >= 4
> ....
> #else
> [warn name space pollution may happen]
> #endif
> would be better.
It may be shorter, but it is definitely not better, at least not in the
current context of qemu. Using the short form will fail a -Werror
build, unless you also write a patch to qemu's configure to quit
supplying -Wundef during builds. But as touching configure has a bigger
impact to the overall qemu project, you're going to need a lot more
buy-in from other developers that -Wundef is not helping qemu gain any
portability, and that it is safe to ditch it (or get enough
counter-arguments from other developers why qemu insists on the
anachronistic style enforced by -Wundef, at which point you must comply
and use the longer form).
--
Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 617 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-13 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-10 8:26 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/6] libqblock, qemu block layer library Wenchao Xia
2012-09-10 8:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/6] libqblock API design Wenchao Xia
2012-09-10 21:07 ` Eric Blake
2012-09-11 3:16 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-14 2:03 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-11 20:28 ` Blue Swirl
2012-09-12 2:54 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-12 8:19 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-09-12 9:21 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-14 19:08 ` Blue Swirl
2012-09-10 8:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/6] libqblock type and structure defines Wenchao Xia
2012-09-10 21:27 ` Eric Blake
2012-09-11 3:26 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-11 4:12 ` Eric Blake
2012-09-11 20:31 ` Blue Swirl
2012-09-11 22:52 ` Eric Blake
2012-09-12 3:05 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-12 12:59 ` Eric Blake
2012-09-13 3:24 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-13 3:33 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2012-09-13 3:49 ` Eric Blake
2012-09-14 18:11 ` Blue Swirl
2012-09-17 2:23 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-17 19:08 ` Blue Swirl
2012-09-14 18:02 ` Blue Swirl
2012-09-10 8:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 3/6] libqblock error handling Wenchao Xia
2012-09-10 21:33 ` Eric Blake
2012-09-11 4:36 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-11 20:32 ` Blue Swirl
2012-09-12 2:58 ` Wenchao Xia
2012-09-14 17:09 ` Blue Swirl
2012-09-10 8:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 4/6] libqblock export some qemu block function Wenchao Xia
2012-09-10 8:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 5/6] libqblock building system Wenchao Xia
2012-09-10 8:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 6/6] libqblock test example Wenchao Xia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50515406.8020203@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.