From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gerg@snapgear.com (Greg Ungerer) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:40:57 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: ks8695: add board support for the OpenGear boards based on the KS8695 In-Reply-To: References: <1346996139-5692-1-git-send-email-gerg@snapgear.com> <201209071221.56938.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <50517FF9.9040801@snapgear.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Olof, On 08/09/12 13:20, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Friday 07 September 2012, gerg at snapgear.com wrote: >>> From: Greg Ungerer >>> >>> A number of boards produced by OpenGear and based on the Micrel KS8695 SoC. >>> Add board support to the KS8695 kernel code to support them. >>> >>> The following machine type entries will need to be added back into the >>> mach-types file with these in mainline: >>> >>> cm4008 MACH_CM4008 CM4008 624 >>> cm41xx MACH_CM41XX CM41XX 672 >>> cm4002 MACH_CM4002 CM4002 876 >>> im42xx MACH_IM42XX IM42XX 1105 >>> im4004 MACH_IM4004 IM4004 1400 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer >> >> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > > Both patches applied to a ks8695/boards branch, part of next/boards in arm-soc. > > Greg, you should submit separate patch to add the machine types to > Russell's patch tracker. I am looking for some guidance here. Russell nacked a separate patch that put the board ID's back in. Do you want to drop these patches and I roll new ones that include the mach-types update as well? Or perhaps do this all some other way? Regards Greg ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg at snapgear.com SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888 8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323 Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com