All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix a use-after-free triggered by device removal
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:26:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50518AC3.2070009@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120912205338.GV7677@google.com>

On 09/12/12 22:53, Tejun Heo wrote:
> The problem at hand IIUC is ->request_fn() being invoked when
> request_queue itself is alive but the underlying driver is gone.  We
> already make sure that a new request is not queued once drain is
> complete but there's no guarantee about calling into ->request_fn()
> and this is what you want to fix, right?

Actually it's a slightly different issue that I want to address, namely
that with the current implementation of the block layer and the SCSI
core it's possible that blk_cleanup_queue() finishes after
scsi_request_fn() has unlocked the queue lock and before it obtains the
queue lock again.

The reason I'm proposing to add a counter in the block layer and not in
the SCSI core is because I think it would be useful for other
request-based block drivers too to be able to unlock the queue inside
their ->request_fn(). That would allow to reduce lock contention on the
request_queue lock for low-latency block drivers.

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-13  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-03 14:12 [PATCH] Fix a use-after-free triggered by device removal Bart Van Assche
2012-09-06 16:27 ` Michael Christie
2012-09-06 17:58   ` Bart Van Assche
2012-09-06 18:14     ` Mike Christie
2012-09-06 18:52       ` Bart Van Assche
2012-09-06 23:20         ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-07  6:57           ` Bart Van Assche
2012-09-10 23:38             ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-11  6:42               ` Bart Van Assche
2012-09-12 20:53                 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-13  7:26                   ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2012-09-13 16:53                     ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-13 18:27                       ` Bart Van Assche
2012-09-13 19:25                         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50518AC3.2070009@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chanho.min@lge.com \
    --cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.