From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Ujfalusi Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v3 00/15] ASoC: OMAP: Convert to use dmaengine Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:44:48 +0300 Message-ID: <5056E300.809@ti.com> References: <1347624358-25582-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <1347851866.1943.126.camel@vkoul-udesk3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1347851866.1943.126.camel@vkoul-udesk3> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Vinod Koul Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Lars-Peter Clausen , Janusz Krzysztofik , Tony Lindgren , Ricardo Neri , Mark Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Dan Williams , Russell King , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood , Jarkko Nikula List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hi Vinod, On 09/17/2012 06:17 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 15:05 +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> Hello, >=20 > dmaengine parts look good to me. How do you want to get this merged, > dmaengine or ASoC tree? Thank you, I would prefer it to go via ASoC if it is not a problem. It = is possible to separate the dmaengine core related patches and the patches= for the OMAP drivers but I think it is better to keep them together so we c= an have them in a same tree for testing it further. Regards, P=E9ter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: peter.ujfalusi@ti.com (Peter Ujfalusi) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:44:48 +0300 Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v3 00/15] ASoC: OMAP: Convert to use dmaengine In-Reply-To: <1347851866.1943.126.camel@vkoul-udesk3> References: <1347624358-25582-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <1347851866.1943.126.camel@vkoul-udesk3> Message-ID: <5056E300.809@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Vinod, On 09/17/2012 06:17 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 15:05 +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> Hello, > > dmaengine parts look good to me. How do you want to get this merged, > dmaengine or ASoC tree? Thank you, I would prefer it to go via ASoC if it is not a problem. It is possible to separate the dmaengine core related patches and the patches for the OMAP drivers but I think it is better to keep them together so we can have them in a same tree for testing it further. Regards, P?ter From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755243Ab2IQIoB (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2012 04:44:01 -0400 Received: from na3sys009aog102.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.69]:44532 "EHLO na3sys009aog102.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755105Ab2IQIn7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2012 04:43:59 -0400 Message-ID: <5056E300.809@ti.com> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:44:48 +0300 From: Peter Ujfalusi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120903 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vinod Koul CC: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Lars-Peter Clausen , Janusz Krzysztofik , Tony Lindgren , Ricardo Neri , Mark Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Dan Williams , Russell King , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood , Jarkko Nikula Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v3 00/15] ASoC: OMAP: Convert to use dmaengine References: <1347624358-25582-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <1347851866.1943.126.camel@vkoul-udesk3> In-Reply-To: <1347851866.1943.126.camel@vkoul-udesk3> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Vinod, On 09/17/2012 06:17 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 15:05 +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> Hello, > > dmaengine parts look good to me. How do you want to get this merged, > dmaengine or ASoC tree? Thank you, I would prefer it to go via ASoC if it is not a problem. It is possible to separate the dmaengine core related patches and the patches for the OMAP drivers but I think it is better to keep them together so we can have them in a same tree for testing it further. Regards, Péter