From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST RFC cgroup/for-3.7] cgroup: mark subsystems with
	broken hierarchy support and whine if cgroups are nested for them
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:11:58 +0400
Message-ID: <5056E95E.2060800@parallels.com>
References: <20120910223125.GC7677@google.com>
	<20120910223355.GD7677@google.com>
	<20120911100433.GC8058@dhcp22.suse.cz>
	<5050568B.9090601@parallels.com>
	<20120912154907.GW21579@dhcp22.suse.cz>
	<20120912171120.GP7677@google.com>
	<20120913121438.GC8055@dhcp22.suse.cz>
	<20120913171832.GY7677@google.com>
	<20120913173958.GA21381@dhcp22.suse.cz>
	<5052E87A.1050405@parallels.com>
	<20120914191509.GN17747@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120914191509.GN17747-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: <cgroups.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/containers>, 
	<mailto:containers-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/containers/>
List-Post: <mailto:containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:containers-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers>,
	<mailto:containers-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
To: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme-f8uhVLnGfZaxAyOMLChx1axOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>, Thomas Graf <tgraf-G/eBtMaohhA@public.gmane.org>, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Paul Turner <pjt-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

On 09/14/2012 11:15 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:19:06PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> I want oppose it as well, but I believe part of this exercise is to make
>> the need to have hierarchy widespread. Warning on the case
>> 1st-level-only case helps with that, even if we make more noise than we
>> should.
>>
>> The reason I supported Tejun's proposal originally, is that I think that
>> if we make the wrong amount of noise, being wrong by a surplus is better
>> than being wrong by a deficit, in this case.
> 
> I think both are valid points and don't think it makes a lot of
> difference either way.  Michal being the maintainer of the code, I'm
> taking his approach for this one.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
That is fine.