From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
Cc: "xenomai@xenomai.org" <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai] ipipe/x86: kernel BUG due to missing IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR entry in ipipe-core3.2
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:18:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5058C8EE.1050803@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5058C79A.5020400@xenomai.org>
On 2012-09-18 21:12, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 09/18/2012 09:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> On 2012-09-18 21:05, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> rah, vectors_limit is not needed at all. I do not see which look you are
>>> talking about.
>>
>> cfg = irq_cfg(irq);
>> if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cfg->domain))
>> per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] = -1;
>
>
> Yes, but :
>
>>>>> - for (vector = 0; vector < NR_VECTORS; ++vector) {
>>>>> + for (vector = 0; vector < first_system_vector; ++vector) {
>
And you know all side effects of that change?
My point is: We have a working version, released and tested on machines
that make use of the affected code paths.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-18 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-11 15:56 [Xenomai] ipipe/x86: kernel BUG due to missing IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR entry in ipipe-core3.2 Gernot Hillier
2012-09-15 22:26 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2012-09-16 7:20 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-09-16 8:36 ` Philippe Gerum
2012-09-16 8:50 ` Philippe Gerum
2012-09-16 10:31 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2012-09-17 8:13 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2012-09-18 17:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-09-18 17:28 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2012-09-18 18:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-09-18 18:31 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2012-09-18 18:55 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-09-18 19:01 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2012-09-18 19:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-09-18 19:14 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2012-09-18 19:05 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2012-09-18 19:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-09-18 19:12 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2012-09-18 19:18 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2012-09-18 19:22 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2012-09-19 14:17 ` [Xenomai] [PATCH] ipipe: x86: Populate vector_irq for all dispatched vectors Jan Kiszka
2012-09-19 14:28 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2012-09-19 14:33 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-09-19 14:46 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2012-09-19 14:48 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-09-19 15:02 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2012-09-19 15:18 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-09-19 16:09 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5058C8EE.1050803@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.