All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Peter Portante <pportant@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-clock: add an alarm timer based on timerfd
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:39:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <505984A6.3030900@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <505977CD.7000404@siemens.com>

Il 19/09/2012 09:44, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
>> > Looks good.  I think Peter Portante tested something similar, and found no big
>> > difference between the two.  But it's a good thing and, in my opinion, for
>> > non-timerfd OSes we should simply adjust the select() timeout and not bother
>> > with signals.
> What would be the advantage of timerfd over select? On Linux, both use
> hrtimers (and low slack for RT processes). I'm starting to like the
> select/WaitForMultipleObjects pattern as it would allow to consolidate
> over basically two versions of timers and simplify the code.

Oh, I didn't know this.  Even better.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-19  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-18 20:37 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-clock: add an alarm timer based on timerfd Anthony Liguori
2012-09-19  7:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-19  7:44   ` Jan Kiszka
2012-09-19  8:39     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-09-19 14:15     ` Peter Portante
2012-09-19 14:27       ` Jan Kiszka
2012-09-20  5:51         ` Peter Portante
2012-09-19 16:55     ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-19 17:13     ` Alon Ziv
2012-09-20  2:54     ` Anthony Liguori
2012-09-19 16:04   ` Stefan Weil
2012-09-19 16:12     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-19 16:22       ` Stefan Weil
2012-09-19 14:20 ` Peter Portante

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=505984A6.3030900@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=pportant@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=weil@mail.berlios.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.