From: Daniel Santos <danielfsantos@att.net>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Where to put test code?
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:39:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <505A499F.1040102@att.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFTL4hyF9c5e91JbVxGyo5RSjm3XuvRmhxXLExamZub3ae5KTg@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for the response!
On 09/19/2012 05:18 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 2012/9/19 Daniel Santos <danielfsantos@att.net>:
>> I'm putting the finishing touches on the generic red-black tree test
>> code, but I'm uncertain about where to place it exactly.
>>
>> I haven't finished the test module just yet, but the idea is that the
>> tests can be run in userspace as well as kernelspace to make it easier
>> to test on multiple compilers. It has some common sources files (used
>> by in both places) and then specific code for both user- and
>> kernel-space that I currently have as follows:
>>
>> tools/testing/selftests/grbtree/ - common.{c,h}
>> tools/testing/selftests/grbtree/user - user-space main.c, Makefile, etc.
>> tools/testing/selftests/grbtree/module - kernel-space grbtest.c,
>> Makefile, etc.
>>
>> Would this be correct or should the common & module code go some place
>> else and then just have the user-space code under
>> tools/testing/selftests/grbtest?
> It depends on the nature of your tests. Are these pure validation
> tests (some batch
> tests that perform actions and check the result is correct) or stress
> tests (something
> that runs for a while)?
The program does both performance measurement tests and validation tests
based upon what you pass at the command line. The primary aim is to
measure performance differences between the generic code and specific
(hand-coded) implementations on various compilers. The secondary aim is
to provide validation that the results are correct in all
circumstances. I'm not sure in this case what would be considered a
"stress" test.
> If these are only about validation tests, then both user and module
> can be in that
> tools/testing/selftests directory.
>
> What is the module doing?
The module is the exact same thing, except built in kernel-space, where
the actual code will normally reside. Parameters are passed when you
load the module and it unloads when the test is complete. Perhaps what
I omitted is that the user-space program is generated partially by
compiling sources and headers that are intended for kernel-space only,
but linked with glibc using some cute hacks. This is done mostly to
ease the process of testing the code with multiple compilers.
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-19 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-19 21:52 Where to put test code? Daniel Santos
2012-09-19 22:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-19 22:39 ` Daniel Santos [this message]
2012-09-20 10:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=505A499F.1040102@att.net \
--to=danielfsantos@att.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel.santos@pobox.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.