All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: jcody@redhat.com
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	supriyak@linux.vnet.ibm.com, eblake@redhat.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 15/19] block: raw-win32 driver reopen support
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:31:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <505C5E39.8060804@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <505C5AC0.5090500@redhat.com>

Il 21/09/2012 14:17, Jeff Cody ha scritto:
> On 09/21/2012 04:43 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 21/09/2012 10:33, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
>>>>> +    /* could not reopen the file handle, so fall back to opening
>>>>> +     * new file (CreateFile) */
>>>>> +    if (raw_s->hfile == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) {
>>>>> +        raw_s->hfile = CreateFile(state->bs->filename, access_flags,
>>>>> +                                  FILE_SHARE_READ, NULL, OPEN_EXISTING,
>>>>> +                                  overlapped, NULL);
>>>>> +        if (raw_s->hfile == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) {
>>>>> +            /* this could happen because the access_flags requested are
>>>>> +             * incompatible with the existing share mode of s->hfile,
>>>>> +             * so our only option now is to close s->hfile, and try again.
>>>>> +             * This could end badly */
>>>>> +            CloseHandle(s->hfile);
>>> How common is this case?
>>>
>>> We do have another option, namely not reopen at all and return an error.
>>> Of course, this only makes sense if it doesn't mean that we almost never
>>> succeed.
>>
>> Probably pretty common since we specify FILE_SHARE_READ for the sharing
>> mode, meaning that "subsequent open operations on a file or device are
>> only able to request read access".
> 
> Yes, I think this is by far the most common case.

Actually ReOpenFile probably only takes into account _other_ sharing
modes, not the one for hFile, so it may even be unnecessary.

But...

>> I would change it to FILE_SHARE_READ|FILE_SHARE_WRITE and remove this code.
> 
> I contemplated doing that, but I wasn't sure if there was any particular
> reason it was originally done with FILE_SHARE_READ only in the first
> place (security, etc..). I was hesitant to override that behaviour as
> the new default under w32.  Do we know if this is acceptable / safe?

... let's just make things work the same as in Unix.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-21 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-20 19:13 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/19] block: bdrv_reopen() patches Jeff Cody
2012-09-20 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 01/19] block: correctly set the keep_read_only flag Jeff Cody
2012-09-20 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 02/19] block: make bdrv_set_enable_write_cache() modify open_flags Jeff Cody
2012-09-20 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 03/19] block: Framework for reopening files safely Jeff Cody
2012-09-20 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 04/19] block: move aio initialization into a helper function Jeff Cody
2012-09-21 10:03   ` Kevin Wolf
2012-09-20 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 05/19] block: move open flag parsing in raw block drivers to helper functions Jeff Cody
2012-09-20 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 06/19] block: do not parse BDRV_O_CACHE_WB in block drivers Jeff Cody
2012-09-20 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 07/19] block: use BDRV_O_NOCACHE instead of s->aligned_buf in raw-posix.c Jeff Cody
2012-09-20 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 08/19] block: purge s->aligned_buf and s->aligned_buf_size from raw-posix.c Jeff Cody
2012-09-20 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 09/19] block: raw-posix image file reopen Jeff Cody
2012-09-20 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 10/19] block: raw " Jeff Cody
2012-09-20 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 11/19] block: qed " Jeff Cody
2012-09-20 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 12/19] block: qcow2 " Jeff Cody
2012-09-20 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 13/19] block: qcow " Jeff Cody
2012-09-20 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 14/19] block: vmdk " Jeff Cody
2012-09-20 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 15/19] block: raw-win32 driver reopen support Jeff Cody
2012-09-21  8:33   ` Kevin Wolf
2012-09-21  8:43     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-21 12:17       ` Jeff Cody
2012-09-21 12:31         ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-09-20 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 16/19] block: vdi image file reopen Jeff Cody
2012-09-20 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 17/19] block: vpc " Jeff Cody
2012-09-20 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 18/19] block: convert bdrv_commit() to use bdrv_reopen() Jeff Cody
2012-09-20 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 19/19] block: remove keep_read_only flag from BlockDriverState struct Jeff Cody
2012-09-21 10:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/19] block: bdrv_reopen() patches Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=505C5E39.8060804@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=jcody@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=supriyak@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.