Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/14] split MRU ram list

[Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>]

Il 21/09/2012 16:08, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
> From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> 
> Outside the execution threads the normal, non-MRU-ized order of
> the RAM blocks should always be enough.  So manage two separate
> lists, which will have separate locking rules.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> ---
>  cpu-all.h |  4 +++-
>  exec.c    | 16 +++++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/cpu-all.h b/cpu-all.h
> index db25f73..3e67019 100644
> --- a/cpu-all.h
> +++ b/cpu-all.h
> @@ -487,8 +487,9 @@ typedef struct RAMBlock {
>      ram_addr_t offset;
>      ram_addr_t length;
>      uint32_t flags;
> -    char idstr[256];
> +    QLIST_ENTRY(RAMBlock) next_mru;
>      QLIST_ENTRY(RAMBlock) next;
> +    char idstr[256];
>  #if defined(__linux__) && !defined(TARGET_S390X)
>      int fd;
>  #endif
> @@ -496,6 +497,7 @@ typedef struct RAMBlock {
> 
>  typedef struct RAMList {
>      uint8_t *phys_dirty;
> +    QLIST_HEAD(, RAMBlock) blocks_mru;
>      QLIST_HEAD(, RAMBlock) blocks;
>  } RAMList;
>  extern RAMList ram_list;
> diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
> index ad2cc2e..0db2beb 100644
> --- a/exec.c
> +++ b/exec.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,10 @@ static uint8_t *code_gen_ptr;
>  int phys_ram_fd;
>  static int in_migration;
> 
> -RAMList ram_list = { .blocks = QLIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(ram_list.blocks) };
> +RAMList ram_list = {
> +    .blocks = QLIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(ram_list.blocks),
> +    .blocks_mru = QLIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(ram_list.blocks_mru)
> +};
> 
>  static MemoryRegion *system_memory;
>  static MemoryRegion *system_io;
> @@ -2578,6 +2581,7 @@ ram_addr_t qemu_ram_alloc_from_ptr(ram_addr_t size, void *host,
>      new_block->length = size;
> 
>      QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&ram_list.blocks, new_block, next);
> +    QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&ram_list.blocks_mru, new_block, next_mru);
> 
>      ram_list.phys_dirty = g_realloc(ram_list.phys_dirty,
>                                         last_ram_offset() >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
> @@ -2605,6 +2609,7 @@ void qemu_ram_free_from_ptr(ram_addr_t addr)
>      QLIST_FOREACH(block, &ram_list.blocks, next) {
>          if (addr == block->offset) {
>              QLIST_REMOVE(block, next);
> +            QLIST_REMOVE(block, next_mru);
>              g_free(block);
>              return;
>          }
> @@ -2618,6 +2623,7 @@ void qemu_ram_free(ram_addr_t addr)
>      QLIST_FOREACH(block, &ram_list.blocks, next) {
>          if (addr == block->offset) {
>              QLIST_REMOVE(block, next);
> +            QLIST_REMOVE(block, next_mru);
>              if (block->flags & RAM_PREALLOC_MASK) {
>                  ;
>              } else if (mem_path) {
> @@ -2723,12 +2729,12 @@ void *qemu_get_ram_ptr(ram_addr_t addr)
>  {
>      RAMBlock *block;
> 
> -    QLIST_FOREACH(block, &ram_list.blocks, next) {
> +    QLIST_FOREACH(block, &ram_list.blocks_mru, next_mru) {
>          if (addr - block->offset < block->length) {
>              /* Move this entry to to start of the list.  */
>              if (block != QLIST_FIRST(&ram_list.blocks)) {
> -                QLIST_REMOVE(block, next);
> -                QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&ram_list.blocks, block, next);
> +                QLIST_REMOVE(block, next_mru);
> +                QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&ram_list.blocks_mru, block, next_mru);
>              }
>              if (xen_enabled()) {
>                  /* We need to check if the requested address is in the RAM
> @@ -2823,7 +2829,7 @@ int qemu_ram_addr_from_host(void *ptr, ram_addr_t *ram_addr)
>          return 0;
>      }
> 
> -    QLIST_FOREACH(block, &ram_list.blocks, next) {
> +    QLIST_FOREACH(block, &ram_list.blocks_mru, next_mru) {
>          /* This case append when the block is not mapped. */
>          if (block->host == NULL) {
>              continue;
> 

Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>