From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (mail.mlbassoc.com [65.100.170.105]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF29E01447 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 05:24:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998) id 63725F8120C; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 06:24:42 -0600 (MDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.1.114] (zeus [192.168.1.114]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2FAF81201; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 06:24:41 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <50605109.6020407@mlbassoc.com> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 06:24:41 -0600 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: poky@yoctoproject.org References: <503550B4.6060708@gmail.com> <5035DBF4.2020201@r-finger.com> <503639B2.4000605@gmail.com> <50598A24.1040503@gmail.com> <1348483894.8662.3.camel@ted> <506041A9.10009@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: <506041A9.10009@mlbassoc.com> Subject: Re: do_fetch error with gcc-cross-initial_4.7 X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion & patch submission for meta-yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:24:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2012-09-24 05:19, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2012-09-24 04:51, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 12:02 +0300, Florin wrote: >>> Trying to build something today and still takes forever and crashes at >>> fetch. Looking at the gcc-4.7.inc I see it's still from git. >>> What would the resolution be for this issue? >> >> The recipe is now using a release tarball. There is talk of ways to >> improve the fetcher in this regard in future too but that is probably >> 1.4 work at this point. > > Has this change actually been merged to master? I just updated and > did not see it. > > ... anxiously awaiting this change to arrive in master :-) > Indeed, this is already in master (and I missed it!) Sorry for the noise, thanks for getting this going. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------